KLA210 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Subtyping, Bookkeeping, Fundamental Attribution Error

13 views10 pages
Social Psychology week 3: Social cognition, attribution
- Making sense of what other people do
- Social representations: making sense of the world around us
Social cognition:
- “People don’t just receive external information; they also process it and
become architects of their own social environment’
otrying to make sense of information in a way that relates to us
- “Cognitive processes and structures that influences and influence social
behaviour”
otrying to predict what others will do and how they will act
oalso trying to influence what people do next
- Rothbart and Birrell, 1977:
oCampaigning for rights of minority groups over world war 2 vs.
justified his scientific studies on minority groups
Waldorn
oExperiment about facial features in relation to the description given
oA control condition as well: not Nazi involved
oPeople see in faces what we want/are primed to see
oWarm/cold features etc.
- If people make judgments about a face they’ve only seen very briefly their
judgments are reasonable stable
oShort to long time
oProne to errors and biases
oA highly adaptive behaviour
oFast but error prone
oEvolutionarily the benefits outweigh the negatives
- Effect of weight on earnings for men and women:
oMales always greater than women on average
oWomen who are thinner earn more than women who are overweight
- Social cognition ‘ is the process people go through to construct their
conceptions o the social world’
oIncludes how people organize information about ourselves:
Data: objective facts pragmatic reality
Theories: implicit theories about data, personality, stereotypes
Theories about judgments: thinking about my own thinking
Is this actually true?
Prejudice?
oPerson memory:
We organize information about people in different classes
about people
Information is organized by groups and by person
Social memory
The better we know someone the better the information is
Snap judgments are made when we affiliate with them in a
particular group
oCategorisatoin:
Receive far too much data for us to process
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Heuristics reduce this process
“ways to find things”
trying to find shortcuts
group into schema, then process in relation to this
group/category/stereotype
the only information given to you
categories/concepts” ‘data reduction that treats 2 or more
objectively separate objects as similar”
cognitive load
allows us to make inference about what we actually
known about them
allows us to make predictions about what these people
are going to do and how they will behave
mostly correct predictions
we revise these schemas when they are incorrect
categories have different levels of inclusiveness:
omore to less inclusive
obroader to narrow
How do we form categories:
Prototypes: describe category
oIdealized category member
oAn image of someone that has all the properties
that we associate with this category
oIdeal vs. average: debate relating to both, still
unclear
oThe more similar they are to prototype the more
likely we will categorise them this way
oMembership is not something categorical
oA degree of match: more or less fitting, someone
might fit better than others
Exemplar:
oDefined by memory for specific instances, a
concrete example
oCompare new members to this existing real item
or person
oBrewer (1988) suggests we use exemplars to
represent categories we are familiar with
oJudd and Park (1988): exemplars and prototypes
represent in-groups, but exemplars represent
out-groups
Compare everyone else to this
Associative networks:
Model comes from working on memory
Information is linked by nodes
Discrete pieces of information:
oTraits
oBeliefs
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
oBehaviour
Links can be emotional, causal, prior experienced based
Activating nodes searching for information stored about
prototypes
Stereotypes: form of category
May be prototypes
‘widely shared and simplified evaluative image of a
social group and its members’
the first thing we notice about a person is their
membership to a category
stereotypes contain traits an individual should have
(stereotype consistent) and those they shouldn’t
(stereotype inconsistent)
think in terms of the attributes that they have and the
attributes that they shouldn’t have
Schemas: theories about the organisation of knowledge about
an aspect of the environment
Similar to category but more abstract
Anything that organizes information about out social
environment
Only look at information that is consistent with category
Hierarchical organisation within and between schemata
oSemantic networks
Types of social schema:
oPerson schemas: for specific people
Close friends
oRole schemas: knowledge structures about role
occupants; social groups
Tells us what kind of behaviour we
would expect from certain groups
oScripts: schemas about events
Lecture behaviour, visiting a restaurant
oSelf-schemas: about oneself, part of ones self-
concept
oContent-free schemas: rules about information
processing
Eg. Rules about attribution
Schemas mean we don’t need all information
Efficient processing of information
oCognitive miser: try to spend as little effort on
making sense of the social world
oOnly have to access schema
oMany cases schemas are correct, but distinct
situations fall short with schemas
Constructing schemas:
oNovel encounter with object or person
oNew schemas for new things
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Making sense of what other people do. Social representations: making sense of the world around us. People don"t just receive external information; they also process it and become architects of their own social environment": trying to make sense of information in a way that relates to us. Cognitive processes and structures that influences and influence social behaviour : trying to predict what others will do and how they will act, also trying to influence what people do next. Rothbart and birrell, 1977: campaigning for rights of minority groups over world war 2 vs. justified his scientific studies on minority groups. Waldorn: experiment about facial features in relation to the description given, a control condition as well: not nazi involved, people see in faces what we want/are primed to see, warm/cold features etc. Effect of weight on earnings for men and women: males always greater than women on average, women who are thinner earn more than women who are overweight.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions