Log in
HomeClass Notes1,200,000CA670,000

ECN 204 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Market System, Comparative Advantage, Limited Government

22 views2 pages
rosewoodchuck939
26 Jun 2016
School
Ryerson University
Department
Economics
Course
ECN 204
Professor
Teresa Fung

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Private property: right to use it, sell, and derive income from it, how to dispose of it (property rights) The economics system likes competition, price shows info on demand and supply, the item will go to the individual that values it the most, Price is how resources get allocated, it is a resource allocation mechanism. As long as there is enough competition every seller will have a incentive to improve because they cant let other be better then them. Limited government: maintain law and order, correction of market failure. Efficiency: promotes the efficient use of resources. Incentives: encourages skill acquisition, hard work, and innovation. Freedom: emphasis on personal freedom, freedom of enterprise and choice. Coordination problem: industries that were linked together had coordination problems. Spend more effort making machinery which will help generate future production, not just for current consumption that"s why the favoring future graph will grow more outwards.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents

ECN 204 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Sole Proprietorship, Planned Economy, Creative Destruction
champagneantelope635
ECN 204 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Invisible Hand, Economic System, Externality
sangriaelk17
ECN 204 Chapter Notes - Chapter 2: Consumer Sovereignty, Capital Accumulation, Market Failure
emeraldhedgehog234

Related Questions

See the question and two answers, give brief your own opinion for each answer( are you agree on disagree with the answer, why?)

Q:This week, we are discussing market types. In this forum, please pick one of the market types that are presented in your textbook and provide your own definition (use your own words) and example. What do you think are the benefits vs. deficiencies of your chosen market type?

Answer 1)

Perfect Competition

This kind of market type stipulates the overall advantage that a market has. In this market, there are many sellers and buyers.These players do not control the price of commodities or services but the prices are controlled by the demand and supply of goods and services. As a result of this, no one can determine the market price of commodities because customers will switch to the next best alternative. All the market players in this sense are price takers and the customers that subscribe to these goods have a lot of experience about the goods offered. It means therefore that they have adequate information about the goods available, which means, therefore, they are aware of the prices that are being charged. All the firms that exist in this kind of market type have a relatively small market share because of the existence of so many of them. The market is also characterized by free entry and exit of firms. New firms can enter the market if they so wish and create competition to the existing firms. Due to this nature of many firms, most of them only earn enough to keep them on the market and nothing more for these firms (Makowski & Ostroy, 2001).

Answer 2)

The Oligopoly; best recognized by few sellers, identical (or similar) products, and its difficult entryinto the market. A good way to determine if a market has an oligopoly is if the change in one seller, causes its "competition" to change likewise. Automotive, cell phone industries, and aviation are some examples of markets that have an oligopoly. In the automotive industry, if one vehicle producer (lets say Chevrolet) changes the body style of its line up, other "completion" is soon to follow. Notice how cars these days are getting nicer and nicer for the base model? Research and Development is greatly valued in an industry that has an oligopoly. This is because if a seller lowers prices, they understand that its competitors will soon follow with ease. But, if they develop a better improvement over its last model in technology, it is much harder to follow than just a reduction in price.

The advantage of an oiligolpoly is that the leaders can set prices instead of take them. Which leads to those that are in charge having the ability to increase profit margins above what they would be in a truly free market.

The disadvantage is that for those looking to try to get into the market will have much difficulty because of the common huge capitol expenditures required to actually compete with the big boys.

1. A reason why there is more competition in the restaurant industry than in the music streaming industry is that restaurants

A.unlike music streaming? companies, have to abide by government sanitation rules.

B.have to cater to a variety of consumer tastes while music streaming companies do not.

C.have more elastic demand for their product compared to music streaming companies.

D.unlike music streaming? companies, do not have significant economies of scale.

2. Why would a government use a patent to block entry to some markets if this hinders competition especially when governments generally promote? competition?

A.Patents are justified because they are an important means for creating network externalities.

B.Patents encourage firms to spend money on research necessary to create new products.

C.Politicians sometimes succumb to pressure from lobbyists to grant favors to businesses for political reasons.

D.Patents are an important source of government revenue.

3.Suppose we can divide all the goods produced by an economy into two? types: consumption goods and capital goods. Capital? goods, such as? machinery, equipment, and? computers, are goods used to produce other goods.

Suppose a technological advance occurs that affects the production of consumption goods but not capital goods.

If a technological advance occurs that affects the production of consumption goods but not capital?goods, then the production possibilities frontier will

A.remain unchanged.

B.shift outward along the consumption goods axis.

C. shift outward along the capital goods axis.

D. shift outward along both axes.

The new production possibilities frontier will indicate that with the technological? advance, more (CAPITAL GOODS /// CONSUMPTION GOODS /// OF BOTH GOODS) can be produced.

4. Market failure is best described as

A.All of the above.

B.when consumption occurs at low social benefit.

C.when the market fails to produce the efficient level of output.

D.when the market fails to produce deadweight loss.

E.when production occurs at high social cost.

The market will fail when which of the following? happen????(Check all that? apply.)

A.When property rights are incomplete.

B.When there is a market surplus.

C.When there is scarcity.

D.When it is difficult to enforce property rights.

E.When there is a market shortage

5.In which of the following market structures is price discrimination? possible?

??????a. perfect competition

??????b. monopoly

??????c. oligopoly

??????d. monopolistic competition

A.?b, c, and d only

B.?a, b,? c, and d

C.c and d only

D.b and c only

6. How do market economies ultimately determine what goods and services are? produced, how the goods and services will be? produced, and who will receive the goods and? services?

A.The government determines what goods and services are? produced, how to produce? them, and who will receive them.

B.Firms determine what goods and services are produced and how to produce? them, and markets determine who will receive them.

C.Consumers determine what goods and services are? produced, firms determine how to produce? them, and equity determines who will receive them.

D.Consumers determine what goods and services are? produced, firms determine how to produce? them, and markets determine who will receive them.

E.Firms determine what goods and services are? produced,technology determines how to produce? them, and consumers determine who will receive them.

7. For monopolistically competitive firms is it always likely in the? long-run to have? zero-economic profit?

Monopolistically competitive firms in the? long-run

A.may continue to earn profit by convincing consumers their products are differentconvincing consumers their products are different.

B.will not continue to earn profit because the cost of production will rise as new firms enter the market.

C.will not continue to earn profit because monopolistically competitive firms produce identical products.

D.will continue to earn profit due to barriers to new firms entering the market.

E.may continue to earn profit by instead beginning to produce a product identical to competitors.

8. In monopolistically competitive? markets, what is a factor under a? firm's control that determines whether it will be? successful?

A. Upper A firm's ability to differentiate its productA firm's ability to differentiate its product.

B.Consumer preferences.

C.Factors that affect all firms in a market.

D.Chance events.

E.Both a and b.

9. From the list? below, select the necessary condition in order to achieve successsful price discrimination.

A. The seller must possess market power.

B. Buyers must have identical inelastic demands.

C. Transactions costs must be zero.

D.The buyer must possess market power.??

10.Suppose Dell is currently selling 3,000,000 computers per year. However, managers at Dell are considering whether to increase production by 300,000 computers. One manager explains that after increasing production by this? amount, total profit would be? $100 million. Given this? information, should Dell increase production by 300,000 computers??

A.?Yes, because Dell would earn a profit.

B.Information about the additional cost incurred from producing 300,000additional computers is required to answer this question.

C.?No, because increasing production by 300,000 computers would decrease the price of computers.

D.Information about the additional revenue earned and the additional cost incurred from producing 300,000 additional computers is required to answer this question.

E. Information about the total revenue earned and the total cost incurred from producing 3,300,000 computers is required to answer this question.

11. The Majestic box office sells tickets for the same play at different? prices: a lower price to those who opt for the seats at the back of the theatre and a higher price for those who purchase seats in the? front, around the stage. Which of the following statements is? true?

A. This is an example of product differentiation not price discrimination.

B. The theatre practices first degree price discrimination by setting prices based on willingness to pay.

C. Charging two different prices is an effective way to avoid an excess demand for play? tickets; the higher price lowers quantity demanded to some extent.

D. Since the cost of producing the play does not change with the seating? configuration, this is evidence of price discrimination based on market segmentation.

Hello, could I get some assistance summarizing this article for a discussion:

Read the articles and discuss the problems of Economic Inequality in the U.S.economy, summarize key points and post in the Discussions area:

Competition police crossing continents

Competition authorities are increasingly reaching beyond their country's borders

Feb 22nd, 2014

WHEN TWO AMERICAN presidents, Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft, embarked on a trustbusting mission a century ago, they were taking government into a new policy area: competition. Industrialization was still relatively new, and any monopolies that had emerged, such as the British and Dutch East India companies, had been created by governments.

The robber-baron companies of the late 19th century were accused of using their industrial muscle to drive competitors out of business. Private monopolies, the argument ran, diminished the benefits of capitalism; by definition, the existence of a monopoly made it impossible for a free market to operate.

Since then, governments have generally had some kind of competition policy, though not necessarily a coherent one. Politicians have tried to juggle several different priorities, among them putting the government in control of "strategic" industries (a category that has always included defense but often also a range of other industries, from airlines to car manufacturing, power generation, and telecoms); shielding domestic businesses from foreign ownership or competition, and protecting consumers from price-gouging.

In the past two decades, a new concern has emerged: that monopolies may be restricting innovation. The technology industry seems to have been particularly prone to creating near-monopolies, from Microsoft in software to Amazon in retailing and Google in an internet search. This is due to network effects. Consumers gravitate to the dominant technology, either because it offers more products or because many of their friends are already using the network concerned. These monopolists, it is feared, will be slow to introduce new technologies that might cannibalize their existing business; and they will be so entrenched that new competitors will find it hard to get a foothold.

Microsoft bundled its Internet Explorer browser with its dominant Windows operating software on personal computers. America's Department of Justice saw this as an attempt to force Netscape, a rival browser, out of the market. In a long court case that began in 1998, Microsoft was initially ordered to break itself in two. This ruling was overturned on appeal and a less onerous settlement was arrived at.

At the time many commentators felt that the authorities had overreached themselves. Internet Explorer was provided free of charge, so it was hard to see how consumers were being harmed. But this is a tricky area. On the one hand, rapid technological change can cause once-dominant companies to lose their position very quickly if they do not adapt; look at Nokia's and BlackBerry's mobile-phone businesses. Some argue that if the market is capable of such adjustment, governments should not get involved. The fact that some consumers make the wrong decision some of the time is not the basis for intervention, as long as all consumers are not being ripped off,  says Simon Bishop of RBB Economics, a consultancy. On the other hand, such rapid change makes it hard to tell whether monopoly positions are being exploited, or whether a more competitive market would have produced more innovations.

Competition authorities have also had to rethink their role in cross-border deals. If one multinational takes over another, that might not create a monopoly in the country where the two groups have their headquarters, but it could do so in another country. A proposal for a merger between General Electric and Honeywell, announced in October 2000, was cleared by America's Department of Justice but blocked by the European Commission the following year. That objection appeared to herald a new era of transatlantic takeover disputes; in fact, it remains the only deal so far to have been cleared in America but blocked on the other side of the Atlantic.

However, there have been other instances of transatlantic disputes. In 2009 the European Commission imposed a 1.06 billion ($1.4 billion) fine on Intel, a chipmaker, after a complaint brought by an American rival, AMD. The ruling seemed to suggest that multinationals faced the prospect of double jeopardy because of inconsistent international rules.

We do it our way

There are some philosophical differences between Europe and America. Europe has a long tradition of state ownership of industry; even after privatization, many such companies retain dominant positions, at least in their national markets. In America, by contrast, market leaders have got there the hard way, by having superior technology or being more efficient. In Europe competition policy tends to be rules-based, with the European Commission issuing guidance for future mergers to follow; in America merger decisions tend to be hammered out in the courts, establishing legal precedent.

But multinationals also have to deal with competition policy in emerging markets. China is a particular challenge. The Chinese use competition policy to achieve other ends to keep out foreign firms or attack existing foreign businesses says, one expert. Latin American countries have tended to adopt the American model of competition policy, whereas eastern Europe has followed the example. Merger authorities from different countries have set up the International Competition Network to share the experience. Such efforts may reduce the double-jeopardy problems in international mergers, if only because rules may be applied more consistently.

In the longer term, the question is whether national competition policies will prove adaptable enough to cope with a globalized economy. It may make economic sense for global companies to exploit economies of scale and bring down prices for consumers, but national governments may be reluctant to accept the loss of control involved. In air travel, for example, fares have been reduced under pressure from low-cost airlines, but these newcomers are still being held back by policies that favor flagship carriers. If regulators in rich countries were to prove more zealous than their counterparts in emerging markets in restricting the size of multinationals, Western firms might be put at a competitive disadvantage.

New concerns for competition authorities are emerging all the time. Chris Walters, the acting chief economist of Britain's Office of Fair Trading (OFT), cites the practice of pay-for-delay, whereby a firm that holds a drug patent pays a generic manufacturer not to launch a rival drug to preserve the patent-holders monopoly profits. And David Currie, the chairman of the Competition and Markets Authority (which will take over from the OFT in April), recently pointed to a vast new potential problem, which he described as the growing collection, processing, and use of consumer-transaction data for commercial ends. This is proving an increasingly important source of competitive advantage; we need to be alert to the possibility that it will be an increasing source of consumer detriment.