LAW 122 Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: False Light, Summary Judgment, Tort

• School: Ryerson University
• Department: Law and Business
• Course: LAW 122
• Professor: Inglis Mike

Document Summary

B(cid:455) (cid:862)i(cid:374)te(cid:374)tio(cid:374)(cid:863) (cid:449)e (cid:373)ea(cid:374) intention to commit the act there is no need to prove intention to commit a tort there no need to prove intention to cause harm. For example, even if you walk on a land that you believe is yours, you may still be liable in trespass toward the true owner of the land. The first category of intentional torts is interference with the person. We define assault as intentionally creating the perception of imminent and offensive bodily contact. The purpose of the tort: discourage threats and maintain peace. Elements of assault reasonable belief of imminent bodily contact. Actual bodily contact is irrelevant (e. g. even a missed punch = assault) reasonable belief of bodily contact. Even if defendant lacked ability (e. g. aiming unloaded gun) reasonable belief of imminent bodily contact. Dista(cid:374)t threat is i(cid:374)suffi(cid:272)ie(cid:374)t (cid:894)(cid:862)i (cid:449)ill pu(cid:374)(cid:272)h (cid:455)ou (cid:374)e(cid:454)t (cid:449)eek(cid:863)(cid:895): battery.