CHMA11H3 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Sodium Hydroxide, Erythrosine, Titration

41 views3 pages

tanwombat447

8 Apr 2018

School

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

hwpark22 and 40164 others unlocked

CHMA11H3 Full Course Notes

Verified Note

36 documents

Document Summary

The results obtained showed that the theoretical yield of copper (ii) glycinate monohydrate was a 2. 52g and the actual yield obtained through the experiment was 2. 0409g, giving the percentage yield of approximately 81%. This loss of the product decreases the percentage yield by lowering the value of the actual yield, as the more product you lose the less you account for. One way to improve this would be to have as few transformations as possible, this way you will lose less product when accounting for it. This can be done, making it so that the product automatically filters into the plastic bag, so you (cid:449)ould(cid:374)"t ha(cid:448)e to (cid:449)eigh it ofte(cid:374). Through the reaction between copper (ii) acetate monohydrate and glycine, copper (ii) glycinate monohydrate was synthesized. The theoretical yield based on the amount of the reactants used was calculated to be 2. 52g and the amount of copper(ii) glycinate monohydrate found was 2. 409 grams giving a percentage yield of 81%.

Related Questions

If you were to use THF, or tetrahydrofuran instead of dicholormethane for this experiment, could you still successfully extract your caffeine? Why or why not? (Consider what is necessary for an extraction to work)

If you were to use an acidic water solution for this extraction rather than a basic one, could you still perform the extraction?â

The experiment is below. Just answer the above questions.

Introduction Caffeine is one of three legal, mind-altering drugs available in the U.S without a prescription. Two common sources of this drug are tea and coffee, both of which are prepared via extraction of the solid foodstuff with liquid water. In this lab you will extract caffeine from food samples with liquid solvents and quantify the amount obtained. Laborator Hypothesis: We can rank various tea and coffee samples by caffeine content by performing a solid-liquid extraction from the foodstuff, followed by analysis via thin-layer chromatography. Experiment: In a 50 mL Erlenmeyer flask were placed 2.0 g of black tea. Dichloromethane (15 mL) and 0.2 M NaOH (5 mL) were added successively, and the stoppered flask was swirled gently by hand for 10 minutes (note: avoid vigorous shaking, as it will cause an emulsion to form). The dicloromethane layer was separated from the leaves and the aqueous layer by vacuum filtration through 7 g Celite 545, and the leaves were washed with a further 15 mL dichloromethane. The combined dichloromethane solution was placed in a 50 mL round bottom flask and concentrated to a minimal volume (ca. 1 mL) via simple distillation. The remaining dichloromethane solutions was transferred to a watch glass via pipet, and the solvent was evaporated in a fume hood. The sample was evaluated by TLC (a mixture of methanol and ethyl acetate as the mobile phase, co-spotted with authentic caffeine). Data: What was your crude yield of caffeine? What was the mass percentage of caffeine in your food source'? Given that the materials we are interested in are UV active, compared to the TLC standard how would you characterize the purity of your caffeine extracts? Conclusions: Can you comment on the purity of your caffeine sample? For all samples your class worked with where does your foodstuff rank in terms of caffeine content? How much caffeine is reported for the typical serving of coffee or tea? How did your extraction and isolation compare with the typical serving?

If you were to run the experiment without using any celite 545, what would happen to the purity of your sample and why? Be specific.

Why is Celite 545 labeled as 545? What makes it special?

If you were to use THF, or tetrahydrofuran instead of dicholormethane for this experiment, could you still successfully extract your caffeine? Why or why not? (Consider what is necessary for an extraction to work) Why is dichloromethane different from THF

Only answer what is above. The experiment is written below.

Calculations First Trial UPDATED

Theoretical yield (CaCO3):

Actual yield (CaCO3):

Percent yield:

Moles of Ca present in original solution, based on actual yield:

Mass of CaCl2 present in original solution, based on actual yield:

Can someone please help me with these three easy questions please? Thank you! SHOW ALL WORK!!

THIS IS MY DATA FROM MY LAB EXPERIMENT. I JUST NEED FOR YOU TO FIND THE ANSWERS TO THE ABOVE QUESTIONS WITH WORK SHOWN!

Table 1: Data and Observations
	Mass
CaCl₂ :	ORGINAL MASS: 2.0g AFTER 24 HOURS 5.8g
K₂CO₃ :	2.5g
Filter Paper	2.1 g
Watch Glass	33.6g
Precipitate	3.3g

Procedure

Put on your safety glasses and gloves (provided in your safety box).

Turn on the scale by pressing the button labeled "0/T". If your scale does not turn on, you may have to remove the battery cover and remove a small strip of plastic from the battery housing. Once the scale is on, press the "0/T" button a second time to zero the scale. Make sure that the units are in grams (g). If not, press the M button until the units displayed are in grams.

Place a weigh boat on the scale and record the mass in Table 2. Zero the mass of the weigh boat by pressing the "0/T" button. Your scale should now read 0 g.

Add 2.0 g of CaCl₂ to the weigh boat. Record the mass in Table 2. Set this sample aside, and let it sit exposed to the air (but otherwise undisturbed) for 24 hours. Complete Steps 3 - 23 while you wait.

Place a 250 mL beaker on the scale and zero it.

Add 2.0 g of CaCl₂ to the beaker. Record the exact mass of the powder in Table 1.

Remove the beaker from the scale. Use a 100 mL graduated cylinder to measure and pour 50 mL of distilled water into the beaker and mix with the stir rod until all the CaCl₂ has dissolved.
Note: This is an exothermic process, so the beaker may become warm.

Place a 50 mL beaker on the scale and zero the scale.

Add 2.5 g of K₂CO₃ to the 50 mL beaker. Record the exact mass of the powder in Table 1.

Remove the beaker from the scale. Use the 100 mL graduated cylinder to measure and pour 25 mL of distilled water into the 50 mL beaker. Mix with the stir rod until all the K₂CO₃ has dissolved.

Rinse the stir rod with water.

Add all of the K₂CO₃ solution to the beaker containing the CaCl₂ solution. It is important that all of the K₂CO₃ is added to the beaker. To ensure this, rinse the 50 mL beaker with up to 5 mL distilled water, and pour the rinse in the CaCl₂ solution.

Using the stopwatch to keep time, stir the solution with the stir rod for four minutes. Then, allow it to sit for 15 minutes. This will allow sufficient time for the chemical reaction to occur.

Rinse the stir rod with water.

Place a piece of filter paper on the scale and record the mass in Table 1.

Place a watch glass on the scale and record the mass in Table 1.

Fold the filter paper in half and in half again so that it resembles a triangle with one arched side.

Pull apart one fold of the filter paper so that three sides of the filter paper remain together, with one side making up the other half of the funnel shape (Figure 5).

Hold the funnel over a sink or any sized container. Place the paper into the funnel and use a pipette to drip 5 mL of distilled water around the edges of the filter paper. This will prevent the filter paper from rising up out of the funnel.

Rest the funnel on top of the Erlenmeyer flask.

After 15 minutes has passed, swirl the beaker and slowly filter the solution (that you created in Step 9) from the 250 mL beaker through the filter paper. Additional distilled water may also be used to transfer any remaining solid into the filtration apparatus.

After all the solution has been filtered, use the pipette to rinse the filter paper with approximately 5 mL of isopropyl alcohol to aid the drying process. Allow the isopropyl alcohol to completely drip through the filter before removing filter paper from the funnel.

Carefully remove the filter paper. Unfold and place it precipitate-side up onto the pre-weighed watch glass. Be sure not to lose any precipitate during this transfer.

Allow the precipitate to dry, undisturbed, for at least 24 hours. Determine the mass of the product recovered by re-weighing the system and subtracting the weight of the filter paper and watch glass. Record your data in Table 1.

Re-weigh the sample of CaCl₂ that was allowed to sit exposed for 24 hours. Subtract the mass of the weigh boat and record the mass and your observations in Table 2.

TABLE 2 IS NOT IMPORTANT IN SOLVING THE QUESTION AS IT JUST ASKS FOR MY OBERVATION OF CaCl₂ AFTER 24 HOURS. ALSO TO FIND THE ACTUAL YIELD, YOU WOULD HAVE TO FIND FIRST THE PERCENT YIELD AND THEORTICAL YIELD.

CHMA11H3 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Sodium Hydroxide, Erythrosine, Titration

CHMA11H3 Full Course Notes

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

CHEM120L Study Guide - Final Guide: Zinc Chloride, Nitric Acid, Sulfuric Acid

CHEM120L Study Guide - Final Guide: Hydrogen Spectral Series, Wavenumber, Chief Operating Officer

CHEM120L Study Guide - Final Guide: Zinc Chloride, Sulfuric Acid, Phenol

Related Questions