LINB06H3 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Projection Principle, Lexical Item, Subcategorization

262 views5 pages

Document Summary

The x-bar theory is too unconstrained and can give ungrammatical sentences. We can fix this by looking at selection restrictions on complements and subjects. For example, smile, laugh, sneeze, bark: transitive verb: a verb that takes one complement. For example, to see, to eat: ditransitive verb: a verb that takes two complements. Most common roles: agent: the initiator or doer of an action. It is always underlined: internal: the one assigned to the complement (direct or indirect object, expletive pronoun: an impersonal pronoun that can be the subject. There is no external argument and theta roles, since there is no semantic content. This violates the second condition of the theta criterion. Thus, it is ungrammatical: sentence (25c) has too many arguments. This violates the first condition of the theta criterion: sentence (26) shows how the theta roles are mismatched. The experiencer theta role is supposed to be sarah, but syntax receives it instead of its role of a dp subject.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents