SOCB54H3 Lecture Notes - Lecture 7: Glass Ceiling, Sex Segregation, Human Capital
Document Summary
Occupational gender segregation i(cid:374)(cid:448)ol(cid:448)es jo(cid:271)s (cid:271)e(cid:272)o(cid:373)i(cid:374)g defi(cid:374)ed as either (cid:862)(cid:373)e(cid:374)s (cid:449)ork(cid:863) or (cid:862)(cid:449)o(cid:373)e(cid:374)"s (cid:449)ork(cid:863)(sex typing) Occupations like elementary teaching, nursing, social work seen as e(cid:454)te(cid:374)sio(cid:374)s of (cid:449)o(cid:373)e(cid:374)"s (cid:862)(cid:374)atural(cid:863) (cid:373)ater(cid:374)al traits. Women are seen as more nurturing therefore become associated with jobs, like this. This was also see(cid:374) as a (cid:862)(cid:449)o(cid:373)e(cid:374)"s jo(cid:271)(cid:863) The typical 19th century clerk was male. Male clerical worker had more in common with their employer than they did with male factory workers. Clerical workers become more routine and standardised. The introduction of machines, typewriters, adding machines etc. Clerical work became increasingly unattractive to middle class males. Increasingly a female label attached to clerical work. Occupational sex segregation reinforces the sex typing/gender labelling of jobs. Women who work exclusively with other women are more likely to see their job as (cid:449)o(cid:373)e(cid:374)"s (cid:449)ork tha(cid:374) those (cid:449)ho (cid:449)ork i(cid:374) (cid:373)ore (cid:373)i(cid:454)ed setti(cid:374)gs.
