Classical Studies 2301A/B Lecture 3: Lecture 3 - Modern Criminology and Ancient Crime, Part 1
Document Summary
Get access
Related Documents
Related Questions
Question 1
Evolutionary algorithms are used:
| In engineering, to arrive at solutions by going through many permutations of possible solutions and allowing them to evolve. |
| A genetic feature of complex organisms. |
| A process undergone by the human brain, which is similar to evolution by natural selection. |
| Another term used for a computer algorithm in general. |
Question 2
Human literature and languages can be studied using methods similar to those used for constructing phylogenies because:
| There is no other way of studying these things. |
| Languages evolve roughly along the lines of species, with mutations (changes in words and pronunciation), descent with modification (languages becoming more different along the way), and branching of languages (languages giving rise to other languages that are similar to them). |
| Because literature and languages are constructed by organisms (human beings), so what applies to one must apply to the other. |
| Languages undergo a process of word swapping, which is analogous to horizontal gene transfer. |
Question 3
The degree to which horizontal gene transfer occurs in eukaryotes is:
| Something upon which the entire validity of evolutionary biology hinges. |
| A mystery that may or may not disprove evolution, but we simply don't know enough about it at this point. |
| Something that would overthrow the notion that this phenomenon is important in bacteria. |
| An interesting and potentially important aspect of biology with relevance for how evolution occurs, but not something that would call it into question one way or the other. |
Question 4
Learning about the history of scientific theories and the reasons for why they are initially accepted or rejected is important mostly because:
| It makes for exciting story telling, and this is very much needed to get people interested in science. |
| It teaches us about the process of science as it actually occurs, which is somewhat different to the idealized notion of a purely objective undertaking. |
| It tells us which theories are definitely true or false. |
| It tells us that science is actually a totally subjective process that tries to present itself as objective. In reality, personal subjective factors are the only relevant factors that really matter in science. |
Write about blancing chemical equations using linear algebra
Topic: Balancing chemical equations
https://www.wikihow.com/Balance-Chemical-Equations-Using-Linear-Algebra
Paper Specifications:
The writing component is minimally a five-page single space paper in size 12 font. The paper is expected to be written clearly and be free of grammatical mistakes in either the APA or IEEE format. The paper must include:
An abstract that gives a clear, concise description of the paper in less than 100 words. â¨
At least two pages that serve as an introduction to topic being discussed. Included in this introduction should be precise definitions and examples to help clarify any new concepts. The audience for this paper will be your peers, so make sure you write at an appropriate level. â¨
A few problems/examples completed and clearly written up. Make sure that you work a number of your own examples and don't just follow examples provided in your sources. The solutions need not be shown in there entirely, but must include a few key steps as well as an explanation of what the computation means. â¨
At least one additional (and interesting) application or example of this topic that was not found within the textbook. Be sure to cite youâre outside source using APA or IEEE style in your paper. â¨
A work cited page in either APA or IEEE style that is absence of questionable/inappropriate sources. â¨
| Criteria | |||||
| Introduction | *well developed; thoroughly explains the problem/process *process clearly presented with lots of mathematical examples & reasoning *needed definitions/ theorems are given | *fairly well developed *informs the reader of problem/process *process clearly presented with mathematical support | *little development *minimal information about problem/process *process not clearly presented and has little mathematical support | *little written *confusing or inaccurate *not all needed definitions/theorems given | |
| Mathematical Details | *proper mathematical reasoning employed & explained *key steps shown with an appropriate level of detail *lots of mathematical terminology correctly used | *some specific mathematical details that adequately explain *most key steps are included with a few unnecessary computations *mathematical terminology used correctly | *either wrong or irrelevant details given *too many confusing computations & steps provided *some mathematical terminology, but not used correctly | *no details given *no mathematical terminology | |
| Writing Organization & Style | *clearly organized throughout *clearly guides the reader through the process using words such as âfirstâ, ârecallâ *transitions given between paragraphs | *organized most of the way through *usually guides the reader through the process *some transitions given between paragraphs | *little organization *often does not guide the reader | *no organization evident *does not guide the reader | |
| Citations | *complete bibliography correctly formatted with reputable sources *references appropriately made throughout the paper | *bibliography included with appropriate sources but not correct formatting *sources referenced | *bibliography includes sources that are not appropriate *sparse references without proper APA or IEEE format | *bibliography not included *no sources are references in the text | |
| Completeness, Citations & Form | *abstract is clear, concise, and less than 100 words *name & reference figures, tables and equations *all paper specifications are thoroughly satisfied | *abstract is is clear but does not accurately represent the paper *many references to tables, figures, etc were understandable *paper specifications met | *abstract is not clear & does not represent the paper *internal references made in the paper to tables, etc *most paper specifications are met | *abstract is poorly written and does not accurately represent the paper *tables, equations, figures, or paragraph formatting was confusing *not all paper specifications were met |