MODR 1711 Lecture Notes - Lecture 22: Sue Rodriguez
4 Oct 2017
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
March 23: short truth tables / legal reasoning. April 7: paper due by midnight - 5-7 pages (max) Use truth-tables to determine whether the following arguments are truth- ctionally valid. Translate a whole english paragraph (sentence by sentence) and test it using a truth table. Supreme court of canada (majority opinion) - page 188 - 190 (pro) Look paragraph by paragraph for arguments that 241. b should not be struck down. Arguments begin on paragraph 3 (while both the house of lords and the law reform commission of canada ) - this is a conclusion on page 189. At least one more argument (1 or 2) http://publications. gc. ca/collection-r/lopbdp/bp/bp349-e. htm https://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/rodriguez_v_british_columbia_(ag) http://www. lop. parl. gc. ca/content/lop/researchpublications/2010-68-e. htm http://ethics-euthanasia. ca/books/proposal-kluge. pdf http://www. dyingwithdignity. ca/get_the_facts_assisted_dying_law_in_canada? gclid=cj0keqjw76jgbrdm1k-x_lnrmuebeiqa8rxyz9cpfeq-svyrgek- h8vs_sqonlnkxrk23y31acebca4aah6z8p8haq https://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/euthanasia_in_canada. Arguments that the paper makes (examples) - arguments have to mirror the arrows in the argument diagram: abuse argument (it will lead to abuses if we , justice argument (it"s unjust or unfair because )
