MODR 1760 Lecture Notes - Lecture 15: United Nations Human Rights Committee, 1948 Donora Smog, False Dilemma

61 views4 pages

Document Summary

Marking scheme: 25 marks per question, as follows: 5 marks: news page 30, vigilantes guilty of arson: P1: the four new brunswick men were defending themselves and their community by burning down the house of a suspected drug dealer. P2: anyone who acts in self-defense is innocent. (implied) C: the four new brunswick men are innocent. Definition: the meaning of a key term shifts throughout the argument. Application: the meaning of self-defense shifts from premise one to premise two. Equivocation premise two, self-defense is a legal term which refers to defending oneself from an imminent attack on one"s person. In premise one, self- defense (or defending themselves ) refers to removing a potential long- term threat to the welfare of oneself and one"s community. Challenge: although this argument appears to be sound, it cannot have both true premises and a valid pattern at the same time.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents