PHL 131 Lecture Notes - Lecture 16: Demarcation Problem, Falsifiability

8 views3 pages

Document Summary

Demarcation problem: apparent cases of non-science and apparent cases of science can overlap in surprising ways. A concept typically defined in turn as the rejection of appeal to supernatural entities. The view that whether or not there are such entities, science cannot implicate them in it"s theories. Metaphysical naturalism: the view that there are no supernatural entities. Verifiability: that a statement is meaningful, proves the truth by evidence. Falsifiability: the requirement that there be specifiable observations or experimental outcomes under which a theory or explanation would be judge false. Auxiliary hypothesis: the idea that assumptions and theories external to the theory being tested, help it connect to empirical observations. Good science need not consist in dropping an established or previously useful idea at the first sign of trouble. But it does require openness to the prospect that new data, new theories, or new concepts will make it reasonable to reject the propositions we currently accept.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents