GEOG 371 Lecture Notes - Lecture 14: Spurious Relationship, Ecological Fallacy, Dependent And Independent Variables

51 views4 pages
Week 14
4/16
Correlation Analysis
Chi square 2 nominal variables
“peara’s r – 2 ordinal variables
o Ranked
o Small n (n < 20)
Pearso’s r – 2 interval variables
Issues in Correlation Analysis
Always check scatterplot
o Always map your data too
Spurious correlation
o Correlation that exists but does not make any logical sense
Correlation does not imply causation
Geographical scale of data affects correlation
o Correlation tends to increase where area/ population size increases
Ecological fallacy
Linear Regression Analysis
Response variable (Dependent variable) Y
Predictor variable (Independent variable) X
Respose ariale respods to the preditor ariale. X results i a hage i Y
Ex crime (y), poverty (x)
o If people live in poverty they may respond to that by committing crime (or are victims of
crime)
Equation:
o e = error term
o a = y int
o b = slope
o Overall fit of line indicated by r2 (correlation coefficient squared)
R2 ranges from 0 1
0 = not fit
1 = perfect fit
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 4 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Correlation analysis: chi square 2 nominal variables, pear(cid:373)a(cid:374)"s r 2 ordinal variables, ranked, small n (n < 20, pearso(cid:374)"s r 2 interval variables. Linear regression analysis: response variable (dependent variable) y, predictor variable (independent variable) x, respo(cid:374)se (cid:448)aria(cid:271)le (cid:862)respo(cid:374)ds to(cid:863) the predi(cid:272)tor (cid:448)aria(cid:271)le. X results i(cid:374) a (cid:272)ha(cid:374)ge i(cid:374) y: ex crime (y), poverty (x) Joint count statistic: binary data yes or no, spatial weights (joins) matrix, 1 = if area i and j are neighbors (rook contiguity for example, 0 = if i and j are not neighbors. To analyze spatial autocorrelation, focus on b-w joins: under a spatially random process: Bwpbp: n=total number of areas, b= # black areas, w = # white areas. J = total number of joins (no double counting) N: based on spatial randomness (no spatial autocorrelation, ho) Is spatial autocorrelation significantly different from random: compute variance (vbw, z test:

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents