PHIL 101 Lecture 2: Descartes' Meditation VI

27 views2 pages
22 Sep 2015
School
Department
Course
Professor

Document Summary

Imagining: forming a mental image in your mind"s eye: understanding: thinking of thing but unable to form that mental image. If it"s metaphysically possible to separate two things, then they must be distinct. Application to souls: argument heavily relies on material from first two meditations, breakdown of what descartes says: I can clearly and distinctly understand myself existing without my body (or anything physical): anything that i can clearly and distinctly understand is metaphysically possible. So, by 1 and 2, it"s metaphysically possible for me to exist without my body (or anything physical): but, if it"s metaphysically possible for a to exist without b, then a and b must not be identical. So, i am not identical with my body (or anything physical). Problem for the argument from clear and distinct understanding: fermat fantasy, amnesia. I (professor kotzen) seem to clearly and distinctly understand killing professor.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents