Problem 6
Luxemburg Corporation produces medical grade isotopes.Theisotopes are produced in single continuous process and Luxemburguses de FIFO process costing method of accounting forproduction.
The production process requires constant utilization offacilities and equipment, as well as direct labor by skilledtechnicians.As a result, direct labor and factory overhead are bothdeemed to be introduced uniformly throughout production.
Luxemburg Corporation prepared the following âunitreconciliationâ for the month of April:
UNIT RECONCILIATION
QUANTITY
SCHEDULE
Beginning Work in Process
7,500
Started into Production
9,000
Total Units into Production
16,500
EQUIVALENT UNITS CALCULATIONS:
CONVERSION
DIRECT
MATERIALS
DIRECT
LABOR
FACTORY
OVERHEAD
2,250
2,625
2,625
4,500
4,500
4,500
3,150
2,250
2,250
To Finished Goods
9,900
9,375
9,375
From beginning WIP
7,500
Started and Completed
4,500
Ending Work in Process
4,500
Total Units Reconciled
16,500
The above beginning work in process inventory had an assignedcost of $4,500,000, divided between direct materials (30%), directlabor (35%), and factory overhead (35%).
Additional costs incurred during April were $15,000,000, dividedbetween direct materials (15%), direct labor (20%), and factoryoverhead (65%).
Prepare a schedule showing the calculation of cost perequivalent unit.
WORKSHEET # 6
COST PER EQUIVALENT UNIT:
CONVERSION
TOTAL COST
DIRECT
MATERIALS
DIRECT
LABOR
FACTORY
OVERHEAD
Beginning Work in Process
Cost incurred during period
Total cost
Equivalent units
Cost per equivalent unit
Problem 6
Luxemburg Corporation produces medical grade isotopes.Theisotopes are produced in single continuous process and Luxemburguses de FIFO process costing method of accounting forproduction.
The production process requires constant utilization offacilities and equipment, as well as direct labor by skilledtechnicians.As a result, direct labor and factory overhead are bothdeemed to be introduced uniformly throughout production.
Luxemburg Corporation prepared the following âunitreconciliationâ for the month of April:
UNIT RECONCILIATION | |||||||||
QUANTITY | |||||||||
Beginning Work in Process | 7,500 | ||||||||
Started into Production | 9,000 | ||||||||
Total Units into Production | 16,500 | EQUIVALENT UNITS CALCULATIONS: | |||||||
CONVERSION | |||||||||
DIRECT | DIRECT | FACTORY | |||||||
2,250 | 2,625 | 2,625 | |||||||
4,500 | 4,500 | 4,500 | |||||||
3,150 | 2,250 | 2,250 | |||||||
To Finished Goods | 9,900 | 9,375 | 9,375 | ||||||
From beginning WIP | 7,500 | ||||||||
Started and Completed | 4,500 | ||||||||
Ending Work in Process | 4,500 | ||||||||
Total Units Reconciled | 16,500 | ||||||||
The above beginning work in process inventory had an assignedcost of $4,500,000, divided between direct materials (30%), directlabor (35%), and factory overhead (35%).
Additional costs incurred during April were $15,000,000, dividedbetween direct materials (15%), direct labor (20%), and factoryoverhead (65%).
Prepare a schedule showing the calculation of cost perequivalent unit.
WORKSHEET # 6
COST PER EQUIVALENT UNIT:
CONVERSION | ||||||||
TOTAL COST | DIRECT | DIRECT | FACTORY | |||||
Beginning Work in Process | ||||||||
Cost incurred during period | ||||||||
Total cost | ||||||||
Equivalent units | ||||||||
Cost per equivalent unit |