1
answer
0
watching
92
views
15 Jul 2019

COMMENT ON THIS POST

Scenario 1: I think Lily’s board will choose a 4% estimate for bad debt expense. Earnings are high this year, so choosing the higher of the two choices (4% vs. 1%) of bad debt expense won’t be as harmful to earnings, on a percentage basis, versus if earnings had been low. Choosing the 4% will enable Lily Company to “load up the cookie jar” (as the title of this case suggests) so that if the indicated “unsettled business conditions ahead” materialize, earnings can be smoothed later since bad debt expense in the “bad” years can be made lower than it otherwise would have been.

Scenario 2: I think Lily’s board will choose a 1% estimate for bad debt expense. Since earnings are already quite low, the board will want to show as high a net income as possible, and this can be done, in part, by choosing the lower bad debt expense estimate. Since the board has reason to believe Lily Company’s operating performance will be better next year, choosing the lower bad debt expense shouldn’t adversely affect future years’ net income in a material way.

The main risk to Lily Company if the bad debt estimate is chosen using only the type of information given here is that financial statements may not accurately represent the company’s financials since cookie jar reserves are being used to smooth earnings over time. This can result in worse opinions of the company by potential investors as well as regulators

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Nestor Rutherford
Nestor RutherfordLv2
17 Jul 2019

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in

Related questions

Related Documents

Weekly leaderboard

Start filling in the gaps now
Log in