1

answer

0

watching

132

views

10 Nov 2019

Hi! I donât understand this question at all- as evidenced by my wrong answer. Itâs finding the standard form with commutative multiplication.

1

answer

0

watching

132

views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

You have 0 free answers left.
Get unlimited access to 3.8 million step-by-step answers.

Get unlimited access

Already have an account? Log in

Beverley SmithLv2

7 May 2019

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.

Already have an account? Log in

Related questions

Please give me the solutions of this six maths and show all the steps. Please provide the solutions for the six I donât have enough question to post individual. Donât provide 3 solution and waste my questions if you can provide all six solutions.

Correct the wrong answer

Show transcribed image text

Please help with all questions. Will rate ASAP.

This question addresses inverse transformations from a conceptual standpoint, a. Suppose that a linear transformation T: x rightarrow Ax from A to A takes some nonzero vector x to 0. Can this transformation be reversed? Does A exist? Suppose that a linear transformation T: x rightarrow Ax from is not one-to-one. What does that tell you about the set of vectors b that can be produced by applying the transformation T to all vectors x in A? How do you know, in that case, that the transformation T is not reversible (i.e. that there does not exist an inverse transformation with the standard matrix A-1 that can be applied to the result of Ax to restore the vector x to its original value)? Suppose that a linear transformation T: x rightarrow Ax from A to A is not onto. What does that tell you about the set of vectors b that can be produced by applying the transformation T to all vectors x in A? Is it possible for a linear transformation x rightarrow Ax from A to A to be one-to-one but not onto, or onto but not one-to-one? If so, please give examples of each case. If not, explain why not. Is it possible for an arbitrary linear transformation x rightarrow Ax from A to B to be one-to-one but not onto, or onto but not one-to-one? If so. please give examples of each case. If not, explain why not. For what values of {a. b. c, d. e.f. a. h. i.j } will the matrix A = invertible? what is the least amount of partitioning that needs to be applied to M; to make M1 and M2 conformable for block multiplication? What is the product M = M1, M2 that you obtain using block multiplication with these partitions? What is the product M = M1 M2. that you obtain by multiplying the two matrices without partitioning? For which three values of a is the matrix B = not invertible, and why If M1 and M2 arc partitioned matrices such that M1 For each matrix product shown below, draw in the partitions that would need to be added to make the multiplication possible: Describe in general how the sizes of each of the partitions(#rows, #columns) in a matrix product C = AB are defined by the sizes of the partitions in each of the matrices A and B when partitioned matrices are multiplied.

Weekly leaderboard

Homework Help 3,900,000

Algebra 190,000

Start filling in the gaps now

New to OneClass?Sign up