The relationships between a forensic anthropologist and a forensic archaeologist can be likened to that between:

1-âa coroner and a pathologist.

2- âa forensic crime investigator and a funeral director.

3- a forensic pathologist and a crime scene investigator.

4- âa police investigator and a crime scene investigator.

answer

watching

111

views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

You have 0 free answers left.
Get unlimited access to 3.8 million step-by-step answers.

Get unlimited access

Already have an account? Log in

Reid WolffLv2

9 Jun 2018

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.

Already have an account? Log in

Related questions

Suppose that you are investigating a routine break-and-enter scene. It appears that a suspect broke a window to gain entry to the house and subsequently let others in through the front door. The following evidence was found.

1)Glass fragments from the broken window

2)Dried blood found on the window sill

3)Hairs found within the home

4)Fibres found caught on the door frame of the house

Using point form describe the collection procedure for each piece of evidence listed above. In addition, where appropriate, you should state whether the evidence would exhibit class or individual characteristics and indicate which department of the Center of Forensic Sciences you would send the evidence to for analysis.

Finally, which of the evidence pieces would require control/reference samples? Explain your reasoning for requesting control/reference samples and how they would be collected.

Consider the following as you plan for your debate:

ï· Good arguments are persuasive.

ï· They are rooted in facts, shared values and critical analysis.

They have a good understanding of the oppositionâs arguments.

Debate:

The state of Texas should take DNA samples and record âgenetic fingerprintsâ from all people arrested.

Each statement has a corresponding case study (see next pages) to give you a better idea of how this technology or concept might be used.

Case Study:

In Virginia, Mia was arrested three years ago for theft and a DNA sample was taken and her identifying DNA markers were entered into the state database. In her trial, Mia was found innocent and received a full acquittal; however her DNA information remained in the state database. Last week a man was found dead in an alley. Yesterday Mia was brought in as a suspect in the murder case due to a match between her DNA and a sample found at the crime scene. There is no other link between Mia and the current murder case. Of course, we do not know if Mia committed the crime.

In the debate im supporting that the state of Texas should take DNA samples and record âgenetic fingerprintsâ from all people arrested. I need more supportive info, anything will do thanks.