Log in
Biology
1
answer
0
watching
211
views
26 Sep 2018

Compare and Discuss the Differences between Jean Piaget’s Stages of Development and Erik Erickson’s. Which theory do you believe is more closely associated with your own beliefs. ***PSYCHOLOGY

Watch
1
answer
0
watching
211
views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Jamar Ferry
Jamar FerryLv2
27 Sep 2018

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in
Share

Related textbook solutions

Molecular Cell Biology
8 Edition,
Lodish
ISBN: 9781464183393
Biology: Science for Life with Physiology
6 Edition,
Belk
ISBN: 9780134555430
Concepts of Biology
OER Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781938168116
Biology
2nd Edition, 2013
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172517
Essentials of Biology
5 Edition,
Mader
ISBN: 9781259660269

Related questions

In one paragraph (3-4 sentences), summarize "Forks Over Knives".What impact has the documentary made on you? Were you familiar withit before watching it; had you seen it before? In a secondparagraph, discuss how cultural wellness was portrayed in thedocumentary. According to the documentary, what factors influencecultural wellness in the United States and in other countriesaround the world? Do you think this is an accurate portrayal? Whyor why not? Give at least one example. Which cultural eatingpatterns more closely reflect your own? Why?

Could you please talk about this movie (An Affair to Remember )

analyze them how? you will discuss the character's behavior, thought, motivation, perceptions, and personality of character using thetheoretical frameworks outlined in chapters of the entire book, but particularly from lifespan development, persoanlity, personality disorders, and any other chapters you feel relate particularly to your character. i should recognize vocabulary and language pertinent to the research outlined in the chapters,( not simply your own opinion using lanaguage you might use sitting in a cafe).

you are trying to Make the CAse of the theories, seeing if you can actually make sense of the character and relationshiops using theory.... all the various learning theories, sociocultureal, psychodynamic, etc etc.

a few questions you might consider:

can you Predict and Explain the characters' behavior based on psychological research?

why do certain characters react/act/feel one way, and other characters another way?

is the character a realistic one based on research or are the characters in the movie purely fantasy based with no logical explanation for behavior?

can and do ...more than one theory explain the character? do all the theories seem to converge in predicting the character?

Several studies suggest that breast-fed babies become more intelligent children than formula-fed babies. One such study (Mortensen, Michaelsen, Sanders & Reinisch, 2002) involved a sample of over 3,000 women and men born in Copenhagen, Denmark, between October 1959 and December 1961. The samples were divided into five categories based on duration of breast-feeding, as assessed by physician interview with mothers at a one-year examination. The child’s intelligence was assessed using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) at a mean age of 27.2 years. The results showed that duration of breast-feeding was associated with significantly higher scores on the verbal, performance, and full scale WAIS IAs. This difference was observed even after the researchers adjusted for differences in the social class and maternal education of the two groups. (This adjustment allowed the researchers to rule out any preexisting differences in the groups that might have independently contributed to IQ differences in their children. The authors acknowledged that other differences between the groups, such as the children’s genetic potential or their parents’ caregiving skills or motivation to nurture, could explain the results. However, they believe that human milk contains various hormones and other factors that enhance brain growth and maturation.

1. State the research hypothesis in your own words. Identify the independent and dependent variables, and define all important concepts and terms as they are used in this study.

2. What evidence do the researchers offer as a test of their hypothesis? Is this evidence empirical (observable)? Is it valid?

3. What explanation do the researchers offer for their findings? Does this explanation make sense based on the evidence?

4. Given the results of this study, why can’t the researchers draw a causal connection between type of food and later intelligence? What might be an alternative explanation for the results of this study? What could the researchers do in order to make a causal connection between the dependent and independent variables?

5. Are there any practical implications for this research?

Related Documents

BIO342H5 Lecture Notes - Margaret Mead, Lev Vygotsky, Donald O. Hebb
scarletgnat781
BIO 220U Lecture Notes - Lecture 17: Erik Erikson, Sigmund Freud, Anal Stage
oliveyellowjacket981
BIO342H5 Lecture Notes - Frontal Lobe, Superior Colliculus, Narcolepsy
scarletgnat781

Weekly leaderboard

Home
Homework Help 3,900,000
Biology 460,000
Start filling in the gaps now
Log in