1
answer
0
watching
215
views
28 Sep 2019
Kristin is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $375,000 of equipment. She is unsure what depreciation method to use in her analysis, straight-line or the 3-year MACRS accelerated method. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The applicable MACRS depreciation rates are 33%, 45%, 15%, and 7%. The company's WACC is 12%, and its tax rate is 35%.
Year Scenario 1
(Straight-Line) Scenario 2
(MACRS) 1 $93,750 $123,750 2 $93,750 $168,750 3 $93,750 $56,250 4 $93,750 $26,250
- Which depreciation method would produce the higher NPV? (straight-line or MACRS)
How much higher would the NPV be under the preferred method? Round your answer to two decimal places.
$_______
Kristin is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $375,000 of equipment. She is unsure what depreciation method to use in her analysis, straight-line or the 3-year MACRS accelerated method. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The applicable MACRS depreciation rates are 33%, 45%, 15%, and 7%. The company's WACC is 12%, and its tax rate is 35%.
Year | Scenario 1 (Straight-Line) | Scenario 2 (MACRS) |
1 | $93,750 | $123,750 |
2 | $93,750 | $168,750 |
3 | $93,750 | $56,250 |
4 | $93,750 | $26,250 |
- Which depreciation method would produce the higher NPV? (straight-line or MACRS)
How much higher would the NPV be under the preferred method? Round your answer to two decimal places.
$_______
Collen VonLv2
28 Sep 2019