Case Study
Richard J. Rathman and the firm of Bernstein & Rath- man, An Accountancy Corporation, were subject to disciplinary action for the willful failure to comply with professional standards, the Accountancy Act, and California Board of Accountancy Regulations by:
a. repeated acts of negligence in their performance of an audit of a 401 (k) profit-sharing plan for years ending December 31, 2011, and 2010;
b. departing from professional standards because they did not perform the audit in accordance with GAAS;
c. audit documentation that did not contain sufficient documentation to enable a reviewer with the relevant knowledge and experience, having no previous connection with the audit engagement, to understand the nature, timing extent, and results of procedures performed, evidence obtained, and conclusions reached, and to determine the identity of the persons who performed and reviewed the work;
d. reporting on a Peer Review Reporting form dated September 25, 2014, that the highest level of accounting and auditing services provided in the previous three years was a compilation with disclosures when they had issued September 6, 2012, auditor's report for the Department of Labor; and
e. obtaining an Engagement Peer Review when they should have obtained a System Peer Review.
They were put on probation with the following terms:
a. After 3 years' probation, both Rathman and his corporation are prohibited from performing audits, reviews, or other attestation services un- less they petition for reinstatement.
b. Complete and provide proper documentation of twenty-four hours of continuing education in the subject matter of compilations.
c. Complete four hours of continuing education in ethics.
d. Complete an approved Regulatory Review course.
e. Be subject to peer review by a Board-recognized peer review program,
f. Reimburse the California Board of Accountancy $7,093 for its investigation and prosecution costs.
Case Study Questions
1. What sections of the California Accountancy Act and Regulations did the firm violate?
2. How would you advise them to ensure that they comply with the rules in the future?
Case Study
Richard J. Rathman and the firm of Bernstein & Rath- man, An Accountancy Corporation, were subject to disciplinary action for the willful failure to comply with professional standards, the Accountancy Act, and California Board of Accountancy Regulations by:
a. repeated acts of negligence in their performance of an audit of a 401 (k) profit-sharing plan for years ending December 31, 2011, and 2010;
b. departing from professional standards because they did not perform the audit in accordance with GAAS;
c. audit documentation that did not contain sufficient documentation to enable a reviewer with the relevant knowledge and experience, having no previous connection with the audit engagement, to understand the nature, timing extent, and results of procedures performed, evidence obtained, and conclusions reached, and to determine the identity of the persons who performed and reviewed the work;
d. reporting on a Peer Review Reporting form dated September 25, 2014, that the highest level of accounting and auditing services provided in the previous three years was a compilation with disclosures when they had issued September 6, 2012, auditor's report for the Department of Labor; and
e. obtaining an Engagement Peer Review when they should have obtained a System Peer Review.
They were put on probation with the following terms:
a. After 3 years' probation, both Rathman and his corporation are prohibited from performing audits, reviews, or other attestation services un- less they petition for reinstatement.
b. Complete and provide proper documentation of twenty-four hours of continuing education in the subject matter of compilations.
c. Complete four hours of continuing education in ethics.
d. Complete an approved Regulatory Review course.
e. Be subject to peer review by a Board-recognized peer review program,
f. Reimburse the California Board of Accountancy $7,093 for its investigation and prosecution costs.
Case Study Questions
1. What sections of the California Accountancy Act and Regulations did the firm violate?
2. How would you advise them to ensure that they comply with the rules in the future?
For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.
Related questions
2-30 | 2â30. Multiple Choice Questions | |||||||
Select the best answer for each of the following items and give reasons for your choice. | ||||||||
A | a. Which of the following organizations can revoke the right of an individual to practice as a | |||||||
CPA? | ||||||||
(1) The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. | ||||||||
(2) The American Institute of Certifi ed Public Accountants. | ||||||||
(3) The Securities and Exchange Commission. | ||||||||
(4) The applicable state board of accountancy. | ||||||||
B | b. The AICPA over time has played an important role in standards setting. Which of the following | |||||||
standards are currently established by the AICPA? | ||||||||
(1) Accounting standards applicable to nonpublic companies. | ||||||||
(2) Auditing standards applicable to audits of nonpublic companies. | ||||||||
(3) Quality control standards applicable to audits of public companies. | ||||||||
(4) Standards for reviews of the interim fi nancial information issued by public companies. | ||||||||
C | c. Which of the following does the FASB consider a source of nonauthoritative guidance for | |||||||
use when there is no authoritative guidance available? | ||||||||
(1) The FASB Codifi cation. | ||||||||
(2) FASB Concepts Statements. | ||||||||
(3) SEC Rules. | ||||||||
(4) SEC Interpretive Releases | ||||||||
D | d. Financial statement audits performed under PCAOB requirements are designed to provide | |||||||
which type(s) of assurance with respect to the detection of material misstatements due to | ||||||||
errors or fraud? | ||||||||
Reasonable | Absolute | |||||||
1 | Yes | Yes | ||||||
2 | Yes | No | ||||||
3 | No | Yes | ||||||
4 | No | No | ||||||
E | e. A basic objective of a CPA fi rm is to provide professional services that conform with professional | |||||||
standards. Reasonable assurance of achieving this basic objective is provided through: | ||||||||
(1) Compliance with generally accepted reporting standards. | ||||||||
(2) A system of quality control. | ||||||||
(3) A system of peer review. | ||||||||
(4) Continuing professional education. | ||||||||
F | f. Which of the following is not explicitly included in a standard report for a nonpublic | |||||||
company? | ||||||||
(1) The CPAâs opinion that the fi nancial statements comply with generally accepted | ||||||||
accounting principles. | ||||||||
(2) That generally accepted auditing standards were followed during the audit. | ||||||||
(3) That internal control of the client was satisfactory. | ||||||||
(4) An identifi cation of the fi nancial statements audited. | ||||||||
G | g. The general group of the 10 PCAOB Auditing Standards requires that: | |||||||
(1) The auditors maintain an independent mental attitude. | ||||||||
(2) The audit be conducted in conformity with generally accepted accounting | ||||||||
principles. | ||||||||
(3) Assistants, if any, be properly supervised. | ||||||||
(4) The auditors obtain an understanding of internal control. | ||||||||
H | h. Which AICPA quality control standard would most likely be satisfi ed when a CPA fi rm | |||||||
maintains records indicating which partners or employees of the fi rm were previously | ||||||||
employed by the CPA fi rmâs clients? | ||||||||
(1) Professional relationship. | ||||||||
(2) Engagement performance. | ||||||||
(3) Relevant ethical requirements. | ||||||||
(4) Monitoring. | ||||||||
I | i. An audit provides reasonable assurance of detecting material: | |||||||
Fraudulent Financial | Misappropriation | |||||||
Reporting | of Assets | |||||||
1 | Yes | Yes | ||||||
2 | Yes | No | ||||||
3 | No | Yes | ||||||
4 | No | No | ||||||
J | j. Which of the following is not included in an integrated audit report on the fi nancial statements | |||||||
of a public company? | ||||||||
(1) The report states that the audit was performed in accordance with AICPA standards. | ||||||||
(2) The report indicates that the fi nancial statements are the responsibility of management. | ||||||||
(3) The report indicates that the auditors have also audited the effectiveness of the companyâs | ||||||||
internal control. | ||||||||
(4) The report is signed in the name of the CPA fi rm. | ||||||||
K | k. Audit fi rms that are subject to inspections by the PCAOB staff include: | |||||||
(1) All audit fi rms. | ||||||||
(2) Audit fi rms that are registered with the SEC. | ||||||||
(3) Audit fi rms that are registered with the PCAOB. | ||||||||
(4) Audit fi rms that are registered with a state board of accountancy. | ||||||||
L | l. Which of the following is not a difference noted when comparing the AICPA audit report | |||||||
to the international audit report? | ||||||||
(1) The international audit report may use the phrase âtrue and fair view.â | ||||||||
(2) The international audit report may be signed using the personal name of the audit | ||||||||
partner, the audit fi rm, or both. | ||||||||
(3) The international audit report requires inclusion of the city of the CPA fi rm offi ce that | ||||||||
performed the audit. | ||||||||
(4) The international audit report includes an opinion on internal control. |