PHIL 1010 Quiz: Quiz 3 Review

34 views3 pages

salmonplatypus87

23 Jan 2019

School

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Study Guides, a Grade+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

If someone presents you with an argument that has a very implausible-sounding conclusion, you might make this move. Basically, you assume that the conclusion must be wrong and so you negate it (that is, you assume that it is false) and use it as a premise in a new argument. So if the original argument looks like this: Original argument: if skepticism is true, then i don"t know that i have hands, skepticism is true. Therefore, i don"t know that i have hands. Shifted argument: if skepticism is true, then i don"t know that i have hands, but i do know that i have hands. Yes, suspending judgement is by siting appearance against appearance. It doesn"t have belief but it teaches people to achieve ataraxia (tranquility of mind) by suspending judgement. Hedonism: pleasure is the sole good in human life. Atomism: everything is a combination of matter and void (they are the fundamental consistent of everything we see)

Related Questions

Brief and detail

If relativism is true, can you ever judge something as being morally wrong? Consider some really horrible actions, genocide, murder, slavery, torture or add your own. If you feel a relativist could say that these things are actually wrong, what gives them this ability? If they can't, why not?

Agree or disagree

Similarly to what I said in the first discussion on what morality means to us, I think everyone has their own set of moral principles and obligations. So I do think that relativism is true, to a point however. I used Adolf Hitler and the Nazi empire as an example in the first discussion so I will use that here. Hitler knew in his brain that what he was doing was good for his nation and arguably the world. Now, as a modern day society we can agree that was wrong. For him, it was good. In his own mind, he is right. But it is relative to the person. Generally speaking we all have similar notions of what is right and what is wrong. Most people would say that going out of your way to help someone else is a morally good principle. Selflessness in society is seen a good thing by the vast majority of people. When I say that relativism is good to a point, I mean that there is a general basis in society that deems actions as good or bad. And since most of us would all agree that hitlers actions were bad, then we say that he had bad moral principles, even though to him, they were good. It’s a little confusing even for me to put into words. Basically, if you actions are generally viewed in society as good, then you have good moral principles even if they vary from person to person. No one will have the exact same moral standards, but generally they all are very similar in society. So relativism is true until the point where the majority of society would deem your actions and wrong. I hope this makes sense.

Agree or disagree

If relativism is true, I don't think judging something as morally wrong is possible. Because the definition of ethical relativism is the moral standard only being correctly relative to each person/society, this means that the moral standard is created by you and/or the society you identify with and therefore eliminate the existence of an absolute moral principle. Since the moral standard is different for every individual, we cannot say that someone is morally wrong. If relativism is applied, that is. If a relativist were to say that they could judge someone as morally wrong, then that would contradict the main component of being a relativist. That every moral argument of yours is correct, therefore everyone else's is also correct. Quite problematic but that is my understanding on the matter

ell25

A mass m rests on a frictionless horizontal table and isconnected to rigid supports via 2 identical springs each of relaxedlength L0 and spring constantk. Each spring is stretched to a length L considerable greater thanL0. Horizontal displacementsof m from its equilibrium position are labeled x and y.

(Diagram insert didn't work, all it really tells you is that xis on the axis of the springs and y is perpendicular to thesprings)

a) Write down the differential equation of motion (i.e.,Newton's Law) governing small oscillations in the xdirection.

b) Same as a but in the y direction (assume that y <<L).

c) In terms of L and L0, calculate the ratio of the periods ofthe oscillations along x and y.

d) If at t=0 the mass m is released from the point x = y = A0with zero velocity, what are its x and y coordinates at any latertime t?

---------------------------

So, I started with just ma = -2kx for a, leading me to thedifferential equation x''(t) + (2k/m) x = 0.

Then I did basically the same thing with y.

However, when I get to c, there's my problem - I don't knowhow I could write any of this in L and L0.

Also, b doesn't really make sense to me because if y is smallwhen compared to L, it seems like there shouldn't be anyoscillation in the y direction.

The answer the back of the book shows for c and d are:

c) Tx/Ty = (1 - L0 / L)1/2

d) x(t) = A0cos( (2k/m)1/2 t)

y(t) = A0cos( (2k(L-L0)/mL)1/2 t)

I have no idea how they got to these answers. Can somebodyhelp me? It has something to do with springs already beingstretched, but it seems they are making an assumption somewherethat I don't understand.

In order to solve the problem you must refer to the first partwhich i already solved and I am 200% sure of the answers, however Iam stuck on the second part and I need help asap. Please do not getscared when you look at this problem and thank you soo much inadvance.

A wheel 75 meters in diameter is mounted vertically on an infinitefrictionless plane at the origin. The infinite frictionless planehas a grid of Cartesian coordinates on it. The moment of inertia ofthe wheel is mr^2. The mass of the wheel is 2000kg. There is anengine connected to the wheel that can produce a torque of 2.34x10^6 Nm. There is a 50 kg object attached to the circumference ofthe wheel that is attached to the wheel with a remote releasemechanism. The wheel is placed on the origin so that the plane ofthe wheel contains the point x=50 meters and y=86.8 m. The wheel ispositioned so that the object is just above the plane at the 6o'clock position. The engine is engaged and begins to apply thetorque to the wheel at 12:00 noon on March 1, 2011. The wheelbegins to rotate in the counterclockwise direction. The torque isapplied for 4 x 10^4 revolutions. At that point the object isreleased from the wheel and a 75 Newton motor accelerates theobject in the direction it is released. The motor is fired for 2.34x 10^4 seconds. (the following questions i have already answered)What is the angular velocity and rotational KE of the object justbefore it is released? (answer for that is 6.39 x 10^2 rad/sec and5.89 x 10^11 J). What angle does the path of the object make withthe x axis? (answer is 60.05 degrees). Where is the object on theinfinite frictionless plane when the motor stops (what are itscoordinates....answer is x=4.85x10^8m y=8.40x10^8m). What is thevelocity and linear KE of the object when the motor stops?(5.91x10^4 m/sec and KE= 8.73 x 10^10J). How much work was done onthe object up until the time the motor stopped? (8.73 x 10^10J).(Hint: the mass of the wheel is 2050 kg while the torque is appliedand the object is attached).

YEA I know what you are thinking at this moment. Difficult right?Please give it a chance and have faith in yourself. Here is thepart I had difficulty with:

After the engine stops firing the object is turned around so thatthe engine can be used to stop the object. The motor is fired atits rated thrust to stop the object. Unfortunately it malfunctionsand shuts down after an hour and the object coasts from then on. Atthe end of an hour of coasting it encounters a ramp that is 2000meters high and slopes up at an angle of 20 degrees. The objectclimbs the ramp and flies off the ramp into the air when it reachesthe end of the ramp. It strikes the plane and digs a crater 5meters deep in the plane and comes to a stop. How far from the endof the ramp does it land? Where does it land on the plane (as incoordinates)? What is the resultant velocity of the object and whatis the acute angle of the resultant velocity with the plane when itstrikes the plane? What is the KE of the object when it hits theplane? What date and time is it when the object lands on the plane?How much work was done on the object to stop it? How long did ittake to stop? What was the deceleration of the object in m/sec^2?What was the force on the object in Newtons to stop it?

If you are from MIT I have faith that you can do this. I am only ajunior in high school taking first year physics that is not evenAP. My teacher is from MIT and said he did this kind of stuff whenhe was there. Please please please help me! I'm desperate.

PHIL 1010 Quiz: Quiz 3 Review

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

PHLB20H3 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Fallibilism, Analytic Philosophy, Earthbound

PH 0101 Lecture Notes - Lecture 11: Counterargument

PHL100Y1 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Modus Ponens, Philosophical Skepticism, Contraposition

Related Questions