CRM/LAW C165 Study Guide - Spring 2018, Comprehensive Midterm Notes - Capital Punishment, Supreme Court Of The United States, Rape

113 views50 pages
CRM/LAW C165
MIDTERM EXAM
STUDY GUIDE
Fall 2018
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 50 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 50 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Mechanics of the United States Supreme Court
composition
o 9 Justices (not judges)
o nominated by President, confirmed by Senate
o life tenure
o 1 chief
administers court, but no extra vote
same nomination process as appointment
can be elevated from Associate or appointed from outside
o 8 Associates
seated by seniority
how do cases reach the Supreme Court?
o writ of certiorari
court will hear the case
o 6,500 writs filed/year
<5% granted
o requires vote of 4 Justices
note strategic implications
o stay of execution requires 5 votes
Clarence Hill case and Chief Roberts
“Cert. pool”
o Justices (and clerks) share review of cert. petitions
o alternative is for the Justice to review all in his/her own chambers
o 8 Justices in the cert. pool
Stevens in exception
o Justices (and clerks) share review of cert. petitions
o alternative is for the Justice to review all in his/her own chambers
o 8 Justices in the cert. pool
Stevens is exception
Supreme Court and Death Penalty
o stay of execution require 5 votes
o emergency stays
each justice assigned a circuit
Puzzler
o questions
Explain what Justice Douglas meant by “if four can grant and the
opposing five dismiss, then the four cannot get a decision of the case on
the merits”
a man named Clarence Hill was executed while the Supreme Court was
preparing to hear his case. Using what you’ve learned, explain how this
can happen.
Argument
o usually 30 min/side
o attorneys only, no witness, no jury
o justices famously interrupt with sometimes nasty, always difficult question
deciding cases
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 50 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
o Justices meet on Fridays to discuss cases
o vote in order of reverse seniority, or dispense with formal vote
o 5 votes wins
except w/ recusal
e.g. Scalia, Cheney & duck hunting
in case of tie, lower court ruling stands
assignment of cases
o most opinions are authored
o if Chief is in majority, Chief assigned the opinion
opportunity for influence
o if not, senior Associate in majority assigns opinion
Burger, vote-switching
o draft are circulated, votes may change
types of opinions
o unanimous: 9 votes
o majority: >5
o plurality: <5, but no other position was able to obtain majority
o concurrence: agrees with outcome but for different reasons
o dissent: disagree with outcome
issuing of opinion
o read aloud in courtroom
at discretion of Justices
o published opinions issues later
sometimes opinions are slightly revised
Rehnquist Court, 1986-2005
o Scalia, Rehnquist, Thomas
reliable votes to uphold death sentences
o Stevens part of the plurality in Gregg, now a reliable vote to vacate death
sentences
o Souter, Ginsberg, Breyer
liberal wing
o O’Connor and Kennedy
considered swing votes
Roberts Court
o Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, Alito
reliable votes to uphold death sentences
o Stevens
part of the plurality in Gregg, now a reliable vote to vacate death sentences
o Souter, Ginsberg, Breyer
liberal wing
o Kennedy
sole swing vote
Clerks
o 3-4 clerks/Justice
o “Senior” (retired) Justices have 1 clerk
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 50 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Souter (bush i); blackmun (nixon); stevens (ford) judicial activism v. judicial restraint: making v. interpreting law, cynical view: politics in disguise. Possessive individualism" and also contemporary media about evil serial killers" or. Certificate of appealability to allow him to even raise this claim supreme. Blacks and women: morgan v. illinois 1992 life qualification juror must be excluded if s/he will automatically vote for death, without regard to mitigating circumstances. Sleeping lawyers: sleeping lawyers (houston, tx, joe frank cannon, 10 clients sentenced to death, calvin burdine, carl johnson, john benn, george mcfarland, appeals courts, burdine, tx. Critical stage of burdine"s trial: victims of murder. Analyst in voter guides as none , unknown, indeterminable, or. Illinois: anthony porter case 48 hours, saved by developmental disability, nearly of ill. capital cases reversed, at one point, 13 dr inmates found innocent, 12 executed, eventually 17 exonerated, 93 reversed sentences, post-gregg, gov.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers