LAW 110 Chapter Notes - Chapter illinois-railroad-v-parks: Illinois Central Railroad, Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel

54 views1 pages
4 May 2016
Department
Course
Professor

Document Summary

A man and wife filed suit against a railroad after they were injured when their automobile collided with a train. After the wife prevailed in her claim, but the husband failed in his, the husband re-filed suit against the railroad alleging an alternate version of liability. Jessie parks and bertha parks (plaintiffs), were injured when a car driven by jessie in which bertha was a passenger, collided with a defendant, illinois central gulf railroad (defendant) train. Bertha sought compensation for her injuries and jessie sought damages for loss of bertha"s services and consortium. Judgment was rendered for defendant on jessie"s claim. Jessie then sued defendant for his own injuries. The trial court held that jessie"s claim was not barred by claim preclusion and that the prior action did not preclude jessie on the issue of contributory negligence. The court held that estoppel by judgment did not apply. However, the court held that issue preclusion did apply.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents