POLSCI 329S Chapter Notes - Chapter All: Counter-Insurgency, Ethnic Nationalism, Foregone Conclusion
Politics of Violence 10.25 Reading Notes
Fiona Xin – Scott Straus (Making and Unmaking Nations Chapter 1,2, and 3)
Chapter 1:
x Genocide: large-scale, group-selective violence
x Perpetrators command territorial domination over target populations, and local actors (harder for
national actors) have information necessary to identify and sort target populations
x National state involvement is necessary for genocide
x Purpose of genocide: eliminates future human interaction, perpetrators likely see target groups as
inherently dangerous, uncontainable, and unwinnable
x Conditions for genocide: territorial domination + local actor integration + large, multi-agency
operations + perception of groups as dangerous
x Individuals are targeted not because of their actions, but because of their categorical associations
(constructed)
x Group-selective
o Group usually defined as a social construct
o Requires mechanisms to define and sort groups
x Large-scale violence = recurring, repetitive, and systematic
o Requires some capacity to organize and sustain multi-agency, multi-level coalitions of violence
across time and space
o Vertical coordination – centralizes orders and planning across multiple agencies and locations
o Decentralized coordination – informal coalitions between national officials and agencies and
local actors on the other
x Group destruction
o Purpose of violence is to cripple permanently a group – not communicative violence
o Usual conception of violence – as a tool that shapes behavior and preferences by imposing
costs
o Conception of genocide – ot oeie, ut teial; ot to hage othes’ ehaios ut to
permanently change the population balance
x Logic of genocide
o 1. Organizing-level perpetrators conclude that future cooperation with the target group is
impossible
o 2. Organizing-level perpetrators calculate that the target population is uncontrollable and
uncontainable
o 3. Organizing-level perpetrators posit a present and persistent threat from the target group
x Genocide often correlates with wartime, but most wars do not produce genocide: why?
o 1. Genocide becomes a counterinsurgency measure because the state lacks capacity to
distinguish between insurgents and civilians
▪ Does not think this explanation is good – because genocide is group-selective and
requires a mechanism to sort the targeted population from the non-targeted population
o 2. Genocide is the final solution as part of a cycle of past attempts to rectify a problem when
the more moderate policies have failed in the past
▪ Requires that the target population be unwinnable, not containable, and inherently
dangerous
o 3. Genocide used as coercive-bargaining leverage over armed opponents, but maximally
punishing supporters of the opponents
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Document Summary
Fiona xin scott straus (making and unmaking nations chapter 1,2, and 3) Organizing-level perpetrators conclude that future cooperation with the target group is impossible: 2. Organizing-level perpetrators calculate that the target population is uncontrollable and uncontainable: 3. Organizing-level perpetrators posit a present and persistent threat from the target group x genocide often correlates with wartime, but most wars do not produce genocide: why: 1. Genocide is group selective violence irrespective of short-term strategic value of such violence: 4. Genocide is preemptive strategic logic and that the target population will be dangerous in the future if not eliminated: 5. Economic logic of genocide gaining access to desirable land and valuable resources: usually occurs with imperial expansion into lands with indigenous populations. Chapter 2: x genocide is nonteleological (not goal-direct); part of fluid decision-making that is dependent upon events and circumstances x process of escalation policy of genocide occurred over time: genocide was not the initial goal.