PHIL 2429 Chapter Notes - Chapter 0: Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, Essity, Cognitive Dissonance
25 Dec 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Moral predators: the duty to employ uninhabited aerial vehicles. If action is wrong without uav then it is with. Referencing uavs that are under human control for lethal action. Sa(cid:455)s uav e(cid:373)plo(cid:455)(cid:373)e(cid:374)t is(cid:374)(cid:859)t o(cid:374)l(cid:455) ethi(cid:272)all(cid:455) pe(cid:396)(cid:373)issi(cid:271)le (cid:271)ut o(cid:271)ligato(cid:396)(cid:455) Claim rests upon the principle of unnecessary risk (pur) Says that here can be stronger forms of pur that say that there is no moral prohibitions against recklessly endangering o(cid:374)e(cid:859)s o(cid:449)(cid:374) life fo(cid:396) (cid:374)o good (cid:396)easo(cid:374), so he uses the safe form of pur. Obligation to employ uavs over inhatied aerial vehicles since they are cheapter to produce and deploy than inhabited planes on equal missions. That is the risk one orders another to incur must track exactly with the ne essity of that risk in relation to the acoomplishment fo the purportied good. Op: for any just action taken by a given military, if it is possible for th e military to use.
