PSY248 Lecture Notes - Lecture 11: Rank 1, Odds Ratio, Type I And Type Ii Errors

75 views10 pages
Non-Parametric Tests: Week 11-12
Non-parametric tests we use these when our normal distribution does not adhere to
our assumptions of normality
Background:
There are a lot of statistical tests in existence
Important to learn what is appropriate to use, when
This depends on your RQ
o 1. What are you investigating?
o 2. How was the data collected?
o 3. What are your variables like?
o 4. What do you want to compare/associate (what is the effect of
interest)?
Assumptions
All statistical tests have assumptions
Assumptions for ANOVA
o Normal distribution of the DV (within groups)
o Equality of variance of DV across groups
o Independence of data points
Why is it important for these to be met?
The importance of assumptions relates to our desire to make inferences
o Don’t need any statistical analysis to see if e.g. males and females
perform differently at university: look at 2 means and see if they vary
o If I generalize that sample difference to a wider population, though, I
am making an inference
Accuracy of the p-values for inferences are based on assumptions if we
violate this assumption, then the accuracy of p-values is reduced
Sample size is important
Violations of assumptions
If violated what do we do?
1. Accept robustness of the test
2. Change the data to fit the test
3. Change the test to fit the data
Non-parametric tests are an example of #3
Example: drug use and depression
RQ is there a difference in experiences of depression in people who use
different recreational drugs?
Drug alcohol vs. ecstasy
Depression (BDI) measured 1 day after drug use (Sunday)
Single-factor between-groups design
2 (separate) groups independent-samples t-test
Assessing normality
To assess normality of a distribution, we can:
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
o 1. Look at a histogram
o 2. Look at numeric summaries
o 3. Perform a statistical test: tests the significance of the difference
between any distribution and a normal distribution
ideally, use all 3 to make an informed decision about whether a distribution is
normal (each has their strengths and limitations)
Normality
5 features of a normal distribution
o 1. Central tendency
o 2. Unimodal
o 3. Symmetrical (lack of skew)
o 4. Mesokurtic
o 5. Variability
SPSS syntax
o Examine /variables=Sunday by drug/plot npplot histogram
Histograms, numeric statistics will appear
Shapiro-Wilk test of normality
o You want them to be non-significant so there is no difference
o The higher your sample size is, the more likely Shapiro-Wilk test is to
be significant
o Although from the central limit theorem, it suggests that the higher
your sample size, the more likely it is to fit a normal distribution
T-test results
o T-test/groups=drugs(1 2)/ variables=Sunday
Example: drug use and depression
Can we trust the t-test results?
Should do something different, so that we can have more faith in our findings
Ideally, choose a different analysis
A different approach
Distributional assumptions apply to the raw data itself
Non-parametric tests all rank the data and perform analyses on the ranks
Solves distributional problems and gets rid of any unusual values (outliers)
Rank
Say we sampled the age of 5 people in this class
Our data would be 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
To turn that into a set of ranks is easy 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Take our scores and order them from lowest to highest
Lose all information on degree of difference
o Difference between 18 and 19 is made equivalent to the difference
between 21 and 35
This is why it is beneficial for skewed distributions and those with outliers
Tied ranks
Say we had some people with the same age (19)
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
We’d have to give them equal ranks, which is the average of what their ranks
would have been, had they not been equal
E.g. with a data set of 18, 19, 19, 20, 21, 22
Rank 1, 2.5, 2.5, 4, 5, 6
Ranking:
This is the underlying principle to non-parametric tests
o Analyses are performed on ranks, not raw data
o How this is done varies a bit from test to test (and also depends on the
study design) but the principle is the same
Non-parametric tests
Aka assumption-free tests (because they make fewer assumptions, not none)
Generally, answer the same kinds of questions we’re interested in in
experimental designs
o Is there a difference in scores between 3 treatment groups?
o Does performance change over time?
Part 1: two independent groups (non-parametric equivalent to independent samples t-
test)
Drug use and depression
Looking at whether depression scores vary between those who drank alcohol
and those who took ecstasy
o Parametric test: independent samples t-test
o Non-parametric equivalent: Mann-Whitney test
Mann Whitney test
o First, we sort our data according to depression scores (lowest to
highest)
Then we rank our scores
o Person with the lowest score (13) gets a 1
o Person with highest score (35) gets a 20
o Remember how to deal with tied ranks
Once all the scores are ranked, add up the ranks for each group separately
o Sum ranks for alcohol group
o Sum ranks for ecstasy group
If there was no difference in depression scores between the two groups, we’d
expect the summed ranks to be pretty much equal
o Sum of ranks ecstasy = 119.5
o Sum of ranks alcohol = 90.5
o Ecstasy is higher than alcohol is it higher enough to trump sampling
variability?
We’re in need of a test statistic, so we can see how likely it is that we would
find this difference in rank sums, if no difference existed in the population (i.e.
a p value to tell us to reject or not reject null hypothesis)
Null hypothesis
Independent samples t-test
o Null hypothesis populations have the same mean
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Non-parametric tests we use these when our normal distribution does not adhere to our assumptions of normality. Background: there are a lot of statistical tests in existence, this depends on your rq. Important to learn what is appropriate to use, when: 1. If violated what do we do: accept robustness of the test, change the data to fit the test, change the test to fit the data, non-parametric tests are an example of #3. Assessing normality: to assess normality of a distribution, we can, 1. Perform a statistical test: tests the significance of the difference between any distribution and a normal distribution ideally, use all 3 to make an informed decision about whether a distribution is normal (each has their strengths and limitations) Normality: 5 features of a normal distribution, 1. Example: drug use and depression: can we trust the t-test results, should do something different, so that we can have more faith in our findings.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents