ATS3462 Lecture Notes - Lecture 11: Rome Statute Of The International Criminal Court, Transitional Justice, Tute

88 views4 pages
28 May 2018
Department
Course
Professor
Week 11 -Victims and International Justice
Vitis’ eeds -as stated by Strang and Sherman
Information -do’t get iforatio if ot eessar
Participation -did’t used to pla a role, ut o usig iti ipat
statements
Emotional restoration and apology
Material reparation
Fairness and respect
o Do’t relate elusiel to iteratioal Justie, ut to justie i geeral
o Victims tend to be excluded
o But increase demand for recognition of victims in CJS
Types of Justice
Retributive -Criminal law (ie punishment)
Reparative -compensation
Restorative -social restoration (apologies/community care)
o International law = predominately retributive justice
o Rome statue has included reparative justice (and arguably restorative)
Takes victim into consideration better
Victims rights and international justice
o Three rights granted to victims:
Protection
Participation
Reparation
o The ICTY and ICTR statues ignores Victims
o Rome statute interests of victims more important than their perpetrators
Definition of victims in the ICC:
o Natural persons who have suffered harm as a result of the commission of any crime
o May include organisations or institutions which have sustained direct harm
o Judge decides based on nexus between harm suffered by victim and the situation
being investigated
there ust e a lik etee atio ad iti ausal lik
Criticisms for the current victim certification process
o Long and complicated -causes delays
o Extensive number of potential victims due to nature of crimes
o Vitis’ lak of aareess of ICC proess -do’t appl
o Vitis’ lak of resoures
o Possible solution: class action process, for more victims to participate
Protection (continued from above)
o Special protections particularly for crimes involving sexual or gendered violence
against children
Closed court
Summary of evidence
- Court choosing to withdraw evidence/information endangering
witness/family
Electronic evidence sharing
Aka: protective measures can be balanced against the rights of the abused
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 4 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Week 11 -victims and international justice: vi(cid:272)ti(cid:373)s" (cid:374)eeds -as stated by strang and sherman. Icc broadly enables the participation of victims as often as possible: but too broad and has the following criticisms, personal interest. For establishing the truth, protecting their dignity, ensuring their safety, receiving reparations, expressing views/concerns, verifying facts: proceedings involvement in early stages gives false hope, and inflates the role they play, presentation of views and concerns. Manner of presentation of views during proceedings. Can be limited by the court if deemed necessary: additional participation rights. Other rulings in regards to participation rights. Records were public except for confidential materials: now victims can see confidential materials too. Victims may play a role in determining what charges to present to: reparations the accused. Allocations by the assemblies of state parties. Voluntary contributions by governments etc: trust fund for victims.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents