JSB171 Lecture 1: Case Summaries
Document Summary
Indian oil corporation v greenstone shipping sa (panama)9. China pacific v food corp of india (the winson)13. Crabtree-vickers v australian direct mail advertising & addressing co pty ltd21. Egyptian intl foreign trade v soplex wholesale (the raffaella)22. Undertaking as to title and quiet possession (implied terms sog)32. Harlington & leinster enterprises v christopher hull fine art ltd34. H beecham & co pty ltd v francis howard & co pty ltd38. Remedy for breach of implied term (implied terms sog)40. Carey-hazell v getz bros & co (aust) pty ltd42. Mcpherson, thom, kettle & co v dench brothers45. Aluminium industrie vaasen bv v romalpa aluminium ltd48. Rondo building services pty ltd v casaron pty ltd49. Johnson matthey (aust) ltd v dascorp pty ltd51. Gamer"s motor centre v natwest: g was a wholesaler of mv"s. Said yes, change in character of possession so constructive delivery. Gerber (sth african case) the issue was whether a road roller had been abandoned.
