Class Notes (834,037)
Australia (1,844)
Law (441)
JSB171 (400)
All (349)

Elements of Evidence Law

5 Pages
Unlock Document

All Professors

Nick Dowse Elements of Evidence Elements of Evidence – Structure of Answer 1. The process when answering an evidence question is: a. Identify the facts in issue i. What needs to be proved to show the guilt/fault of the party charged (called ‘main facts in issue’) ii. The main facts in issue are determined by the substantive law of the case, for example: 1. Contract: offer, acceptance, intention to create legal relations, consideration, capacity, certainty, etc… 2. Tort: negligence: duty, breach, damage 3. Criminal law: elements of offence in Criminal Code. iii. Main facts in issue must be proved by the prosecution (or the plaintiff in a civil case) iv. The collateral facts in issue are those facts that will help win the case, but that are not from the substantive law. v. The three types of collateral facts in issue are those that: 1. Affect the credibility of the witness; 2. Affect the admissibility of evidence; 3. Determine the way judicial discretion will be exercised. vi. Collateral facts in issue are governed by the rules of evidence, not the substantive law. b. Identify the pieces of evidence available to prove the facts in issue i. Direct evidence 1. Testimony a. Competence and compellability i. Interpreters, children, vulnerable witnesses b. Refreshment of memory from documents c. Prior consistent or inconsistent statements d. Hearsay i. Exceptions to hearsay e. Admissions and confessions f. Expert witnesses g. Opinion evidence 2. Documents a. Hearsay i. Exceptions to hearsay b. Proof of execution, handwriting, attestation 3. Objects a. Called “real evidence” b. Photos, videos, murder weapon etc 4. Places a. Views b. Demonstrations c. Experiments ii. Circumstantial evidence 1. Motive, opportunity, habit, conduct 2. Propensity, similar fact evidence iii. Collateral facts 1. Credibility of witness, admissibility of evidence, judicial discretion c. Is the piece of evidence sufficiently relevant? i. To be admitted into evidence, must be sufficiently relevant. d. Is the piece of evidence admissible? i. If it is caught by an exclusionary rule, it will not be received into evidence. Page 1 of 5 Nick Dowse Elements of Evidence ii. If prima face admissible, or is inadmissible but caught by an inclusionary rule, it may be received into evidence. e. Judicial discretion i. Should the judge exercise discretion to exclude the otherwise admissible evidence on the basis of fairness or public policy? 1. See “Judicial Discretion” notes. 2. Main Facts in Issue a. The main facts in issue are the facts that the plaintiff/prosecution must prove to succeed, as determined by the relevant substantive law. b. The main facts in issue will also include facts required to establish defences or excuses. c. Elements of murder (s 302(1) CC) i. Unlawful killing (s 291); and 1. Means not authorised, justified or excused by law ii. Intention to cause death or GBH required (s 302(1)(a)). 3. Collateral Facts in Issue a. Collateral facts in issue are those which relate to: i. Credibility ii. Admissibility iii. Whether judicial discretion will be exercised. b. Collateral facts in issue do not need to be proved to succeed. 4. Burden and Standard of Proof a. The burden, or onus, of proof is the responsibility of a party to introduce evidence in support of his or her case. The goal is to persuade the tribunal of fact that the main facts in issue are established. b. The “legal burden” of proof is that which requires the proponent of a substantive issue to prove it, or lose the case. c. The “evidential burden” of proof is the obligation of a party faced with a legal burden to adduce evidence to discharge the legal burden. d. The evidential burden follows the legal burden. e. Criminal Case i. Legal and evidential burden on prosecution to prove offences BRD, and on accused to raise defences on the BOP (or, with excuses, to raise some credible evidence) and then on the prosecution to negative them BRD. ii. Viscount Sankey in Wollington: “golden thread in criminal law means that an accused does not need to prove their innocence, but rather the prosecution must prove offences beyond reasonable doubt.” iii. However, there is a de facto evidential burden on the accused when they raise evidence of an defence/excuse 1. Insanity (defence) a. The defence of insanity (s 27 Criminal Code) lays down a presumption of sanity in s 26 Criminal Code which reflects the requirement that the accused prove his own sanity in rebuttal of the presumption that they were of sound mind at the time of the offence (McNaghten; R v Porter). Because there is a presumption of sanity, the legal burden will therefore be on the accused to prove the elements to the defence of insanity. 2. Intoxication (defence) a. The defence of intoxication (s 28 Criminal Code) provides that s 27 (insanity) applies to case of a person who has not intentionally caused him/herself to become intoxicated. Like insanity, the legal burden will be on the accused to prove the elements of the defence of intoxication in s 28. 3. Intoxication (excuse) Page 2 of 5 Nick Dowse Elements of Evidence a. The excuse of “intoxicated, no intent” in s 28(3) is an excuse. Once the defence raises the excuse of act independent of will, the burden is on the Crown to negative it beyond reasonable doubt – the legal burden never shifts. 4. Diminished responsibility (defence) a. Section 304A(1) Criminal Code provides a defence that has the effect of reducing a murder charge to one of manslaughter in the case of an accused proved to be suffering from an ‘
More Less

Related notes for JSB171

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.