Class Notes (809,472)
Australia (1,838)
Psychology (25)
PYB202 (4)
Unknown (4)
Lecture 2

PYB202 Lecture 2 Notes.docx

4 Pages
Unlock Document

Queensland University of Technology

PYB202 Lecture Two Notes Social Influence 1. What is Social Influence? Social influence is the process in which the attitudes and behaviour of a person may be influenced by the actual, imagined or implied presence of others. 2. What are Norms? Norms are the attitudinal and behavioural uniformities that define group membership and differentiate between groups. 3. Reference Groups and Membership Groups  Kelley (1952) has made a valuable distinction between reference groups and membership groups.  Reference groups are those which are psychologically significant to a person. This can be either positive in the sense that person seeks to behave in accordance with their norms, or negative in the sense that a person seeks to behaving in a way that opposes the group’s norms. o An example of a reference group could be a young girl looking to her mother and her mother’s friends for direction on how to behave as a proper ‘lady’.  Membership groups are those to which we belong according to some subjective criterion or social consensus. o An example of a membership group could simply be a young girl belonging to the group ‘females’ because of her gender.  While a positive reference group which is also our membership group is a source of conformity and is socially validated, a negative reference group which is also a membership group will have enormous coercive power to produce compliance. o For example, a student who despises every aspect of student life and would much rather be a lecturer because they identify with lecturer norms would belong to the membership group of ‘student’ and this would be a negative reference group. The membership group of ‘lecturer’ would be a more suited and positive reference group however it is not the student’s membership group. Therefore, the student would comply with student norms but would conform to lecturer norms. 4. Three Different Types of Social Influence Compliance  We are all familiar with the difference between yielding to a direct or indirect pressure from a group or individual and being genuinely persuaded by them.  For example, we have all been in situations when we have gone along with another person’s direction without accepting their views. We have also experienced actual deep-rooted changes in our beliefs and opinions as a result of another person.  Social psychologists have noticed this difference, and find it useful to distinguish between coercive compliance and genuine persuasive influence.  Compliance is the superficial, public and transitory change of a person’s behaviour and attitudes in response to the requests, coercion or pressure of another person (or group). Because it does not reflect deep-rooted changes in a person, it is usually only upheld whilst under surveillance.  An important requirement of compliance is that the source of social influence is perceived as having influence or power over the individual – power is the basis for compliance.  Some strategies of obtaining compliance from others include: o Ingratiation – making yourself seem more likeable to someone in order to influence them. o Reciprocity – you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. o Multiple Requests  Foot in the door technique – start with a smaller request than what you want and gradually make your way to the larger requests.  Door in the face request – start with an outrageous request and then scale it down to what you actually want.  The low-ball technique – adding attractive inducements to make something seem more appealing. Obedience  Milgram (1974, 1992) conducted an experiment which is widely regarded today as the most influential in studying the effects of authority on obedience.  In his study, Milgram examined the effects of authority on obedience by measuring just how far an ordinary man would go in obeying authoritative orders and in doing so physically harm a man with electric shocks under the pretence of scientific gain.  The findings of this study were shockingly higher than anticipated, posing serious questions about the nature of humanity and raising implications concerning the actions of people whilst operating under ‘orders’.  Milgram was also interested in the obedience evident in Nazi Germany, in which mild-mannered, polite and otherwise seemingly normal men carried out mass slaughter and did so under the command of a higher authority without question.  This frame of mind is called an agentic state, in which people exhibit unquestioning obedience to a higher authority and transfers the responsibilities of their actions to this authority.  Factors which could affect obedience can include: o Gender differences – for example in a feminine-based study, males may be more likely to conform with the females’ answers and vice versa. There have been no found differences in males or females in neutral-based settings. o Commitment to course of action – similar to Milgram’s study, many participants may have felt that since they had already begun the experiment they had a duty to finish it. o Immediacy – if the victim was more immediately located or visible to the participant in Milgram’s study, that may have lowered obedience. Similarly, the near presence of the authoritative figure throughout the study may have caused the participant to obey more. o Group pressure – this often contributes to a person’s obedience if they feel pressured by the group to do so and do not want to risk social exclusion etc. o Legitimacy of authority figure – in Milgram’s study the authority figure was dressed in a white lab coat, was a member of Yale University and was a scientist. This added to the legitimacy of the situation and may have positively influenced the obedience of the participant. Conformity  Conformity is the result of social influence producing internalised acceptance of behaviour. It means that the subject truly believes that the beliefs and actions of a social norm are correct, and thus will act according to this behaviour even without surveillance.  Asch’s (1951, 1952, 1956) autokinetic experiment examined the convergence effect on the participants and found that when participant’s used others as a frame of reference for their answers, their answers to a test were dramatically closer to one another when interviewed as a group.  This was reflected later in individual interviews when participants were asked the same question alone – even though the group was no longer present to influence, the participants had appeared to internalise or conform to the standard group answer, which was often different from their initial individual answer.  Interestingly, in further experiments conducted it was found that even when participants were sure the group’s responses were wrong, a high percentage continued to conform to the answer held by the majority.  Possible reasons for this include fear of group exclusion, insecurity in own judgements and genuine belief in the group’s collective response.  Factors which influence conformity could include: o Privacy/anonymity of responses – studies found that in situations where the individual’s answer was anonymous they were more likely to answer independently from the group. o Personality traits – while this could influence conformity it has been largely found that it situationally dependent and even the most stubborn people could potentially still conform in the right situation. o Cultural differences – unsurprisingly it was found that often collectivist cultures are more likely to conform than individualist cultures. o Group size – interestingly, groups of 3 – 5 individuals in size were found to be most influential in conformity, whilst groups larger than this exhibited no difference or greater capacity to influence. o Unanimity of responses – studies found that conformity is greatly reduced in situations where just one other supporter of the correct answer is present. 5. Processes Underlying Conformity  There are three processes typically said to underlie conformity: informational influence, normative influence and referent informational influence.  Informational influence means accepting information from another
More Less

Related notes for PYB202

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.