Class Notes (808,849)
Canada (493,411)
POLS 2783 (1)


17 Pages
Unlock Document

Acadia University
Political Science
POLS 2783
Jerome Klassen

Theories of Global Politics 1/10/2013 12:00:00 PM Complex world Find connections and links Economic crisis- ongoing, prolonged - Cutting back social programs- working class fighting back - New Revolutions- Arab world 9/11- New security concerned. Rogue states- Iraq, North Korea. Weapons of mass destruction, terrorism Human Rights- military conflict. Syria Neoliberal development policies- free market policies- lots of economic growth but polarization of rich and poor. Environmental Crisis- growing concerned Migration How do we theorize these elements of the world? What are theories?  Set of concepts or ideas people and academics use to understand the world or society  Different theories emphasize different things.  Hypothesize that seek fundamental structure or operation  Based on abstraction, drawing links between them  Explains reality Realism: Dominant theory in Canada Suggestions on how political practice should work Historical context: 1930‟s/1940‟s US Why US? Failures in policy, after WW1 strongest economy in world, but isolated itself from the world. Idea that if countries just interacted with each other economically it would produce peace too. It was wrong. WW2 happened *Realistic study of world politics, how it really works not how it should work. Get away from preferences on how it should work ideally. Classical Realism: Morgenthau: 6 principals *see slide. Struggle for power Dark scary world- inherent to human nature, no escape States must be ready for military conflict. It‟s human nature to produce conflict Balance of power, between power, have different capacities. Does your neighbor have a better military? You better build yours up BITCH! **Security Dilemma Balance of power drives international politics. This should be the paramount focus. Critique: post-war period. By people on left. - Too close to the fire, Done by Americans intellectuals, they didn‟t have the science it was an ideology, it was designed to support American primacy. - Inside realist tradition: co-evils- power and politics. Conflicted w/ cold war ideology which was that capitalism was good it was freedom. Neo-realism - Purge normative foundation of classical realism- get rid of assumptions about human nature. Wanted it to be more scientific. - Waltz- founder. Reject individual or national level. Rid of reductionist. Wanted to focus on systemic factors. Have to study the state system. Competing nation-states, they form world politics. - Anarchy constitutes international state system. Unregulated/ungoverned way. - States focus should be to rely on itself. Self help. It pays to be selfish in a self-help world. - Concerned with balance of power to ensure survival. National Security should be the main focus. - State is the key unit of analysis Critiques: - Weak view on the state. Presumes that the state isn‟t impacted by domestic issues. Cannot treat them as though they are disconnected - Tends to be militaristic ideologies. - Treats states all the same – democratic etc. and the difference between them will differentiate them Liberalism: - 2ndmost dominant. - Broadening framework, doesn‟t just focus on state and power etc They look at economics etc. - Insist politics of states matter, and that the state system can be changed. Doesn‟t have to be endless war. War is not inevitable - Can have multinational security. Not self help - The individual is the focus. Economic: - Supports capitalism the most. It‟s human nature. Freedom. Get something out of trade. - Trade investment. Everyone benefits in international trade. More peace. Interdependence. More wealth all around. - More development more trade more interdependence. - Increase international convergence. - Free trade encouraged Politics: - Political character of states determines how international politics plays out. - two types of states: Liberal democratic states and non-liberal democratic states. - Define states: Liberal states: individual rights protection, they‟re peaceful, because they are democracies, Democratic caution. If they engage in violence they will be voted out – that‟s the fear. Encourage peace. - Non liberal states: Exist in a state of war in non-liberal states. They don‟t worry about the population. They can just suppress them. More prone to war. Not accountable to their people. - Non-liberal and liberal states are in a constant state of war. Liberal states believe they need to intervene in non-liberal states for humanitarian right. - - International law disagrees with this. States are sovereign. Liberals believe they do not deserve their sovereignty. Contradictions: - Defends capitalism and equal exchanges. However, unequal state powers manage this system. Certain states given the right to manage the system. - Calls for military action for humanitarian rights, this in itself…in waging war - Sometimes serve as ideology of capitalism…not scientific - Capitalism is not created equally. 500 years of it and it‟s still not equal Marxism: - Social relations. - Theory about how capitalism works - Marxism is back. It‟s Britney bitch. - All the problems are linked to the capitalism system. - Class is the key dynamic - State is dominated by rich and powerful. - defined by imperialism or exploitation of poor countries for larger economic reasons. - Capitalism is unique, a motive production. Social relationship- working class and those who own those productions - Recognize dynamic of capitalism. Contradictory motive production- very productive system and innovated, created a world society that‟s integrated, allowed humans to conquer nature. Democratic states, enhanced human freedom. HOWEVER! It is uncontrollable, profit controls everything. Cannot be regulated. Built in crisis tendencies. Nurtures individualism, therefore pushing away from community and locality. Exploits nature. Exploits labour. Serves the wealthy. - National security is a fiction. Classes are highly divided. There is no nation, the nation is a fiction. Only benefits rich nations. Limitations: - Being economist, have a big focus on economics. - Sometimes they simplify explanations: 2 classes in the world - Political reduction Feminism: - Gendered lens, how are women and girls affected. Gender social relations/stereotypes - Gender hierarchies - Other theories ignore this - Womens labour in 3 rd W. China - Migrating- oppressions, sex industry - Rape as a military strategy - Militaristic tendencies, gendered approaches - Intersections of race/class/gender US Power 1/10/2013 12:00:00 PM Context: 1870-1914 European powers formal colonization, territory. Formal Empire. Berlin treaty- Africa divided into colonies. Expansion, resources. They globalized capitalism, spread it around the world. Fierce competition for territory. Allies. Exploded in 1914- world war US was outside this system, they had a few colonies but not many. 1900- US biggest economy in the world. WW1 huge amount of exports. Trade surplus. Export more goods than it imported. Euros needed American resources. US lended money to Euros. Lots of people owed money to the state. Crediter state. Wall St. Key financial spots in the world. US corporation investing abroad more than foreign companies were investing in the US US enters War.- US wanted to secure loans (England and France) - Gain military experience US still remains isolationist with respect to Europe. After the War, they kind of abandoned Europe and their rebuild didn‟t want to get caught up in conflict. US opposes League of Nations and Treaty of Versailles. Britain and France divide up Middle East. Asian and Italian expansion. US contradictory. Global economic power. WW2 changes this. Key economic/political/military elites begin significant planning for post-war period. Wanted to secure economic primacy and systems. Joined WW2- US was worried that perimeter Eurasia would be dominanted by Germany and Japan, which would exclude US primacy Europe, they were scared of communism Feared GB would be extended into post war period if they took Germany. US wanted to break down British Empire in the post-war period * New world order that they expect to lead. Hegemonic Liberalism: Strategy: US wanted to expand capitalism globally, formal euro colonies dissolve. Support liberal state system, wanted everyone to be soverign - Wanted to expand/maintain their primacy After WW2: US had a lot of economic/political power. Occupied key industrial centers. Lots of military bases all over the world. 50% of all economic activity in the states. ***See slide Very privileged position preponderant power US interests: - Dependant on foreign resources. Need access all over the world, a lot in developing countries. Need that relationship - Needed export market, but needed the demand. Rebuild capitalism all over the world. Especially in Japan and Britain - Worried about communism and movement. Capitalism needed to be maintained. - Needed Western Europe to not be neutral in Cold War. Wanted allies. What they did: - Wanted Europe to be capitalist - Contain left wing movements - Build institutions under US - Militarism to enforce informal empire: imperialism without colonies. To enforce global capitalism. 1945: UN formed, Rid of old alliance system. Keep peace for world as a whole. 1944: Brentton Woods Agreement: Key economic institutions: World Bank, IMF (help countries with balance of trade). Monetary system: linked dollar to gold. Allowed for capital controls- governments could control the amount of money in and out of their economies- taxes etc. Western Europe: Avoid neutralism Link Germany NATO, 1949- defend Europe against communism, making sure left movements couldn‟t come to power. “Americans in [Europe], Russians out and Germans down” Dismantle British Empire. Access colonies. Uses finances to bribe British Eastern Europe - Contain and destroy Soviets. NSC 68 Asia: Revive capitalism Korean War Support French colonizing- Vietnam. Failed. Broadly: Eclectic strategy to 3rdW- Fears losing resources. Liberal principles for the world. Fear revolution and the left. Middle East: Resources, oil especially. Strategic power. Backs a lot of military coups CRISIS: Hegemony discredits it. Poorest people beating the richest people. Violent. Economic: Japan and Germany catching up economically, too much production, declining profit. Competition. Importing more than its exporting Nixon: Cancels Brentton Woods agreement ***NEOLIBERALISM: extreme free market economic program, pushed by US. 1970‟s to present. Enforce on other countries too. Tax cuts, privatization, cuts to social programs. Does this to prop up its power Rid the world of tariffs (taxes on trade) Encourage riding of capital controls: to improve US power. 1979: VOLCKER SHOCK* - US central bank, jacks up interests rates, companies don‟t borrow and invest. Recession imposed intentionally. Wanted competition and inefficient firms to go bankrupt and discipline trade unions and power of labou
More Less

Related notes for POLS 2783

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.