Lecture 6 – Family
Nuclear family:
-cohabitating man and woman who have an appropriate sexual relationship and have at least 2 children
-wife works at home and husband works outside of home and is the primary source of income (traditional)
- there has been a decrease in the nuclear family since the 1940’s
-many moral entrepreneurs:
-moral entrepreneur = someone who makes a living telling society that it’s falling apart because it’s taking
an immoral direction
-the family is changing and shifting away from the traditional nuclear family
-marriage rate is decreasing
-divorce rates have been stable for decades but it is very high (~40-50%)
-since the 1950s, divorce is 50% more often than not
-marital breakdown combined with an increase in the number of children born outside of marriage (illegitimate)
-means more divorces, fewer getting married, shift away from the nuclear family, 50% of children today will spend
some time in a single parent set up
-a bit harder on boys than girls because single parent families are mostly led by females
-boys need fathers
-if not, there is a greater likelihood for them to do poorly in school and get into trouble
South Africa:
-in one of the national parks male elephants became more numerous
-they shot the bull elephants
-the young male elephants became rogue elephants because there were no older ones to
keep them in line
-may be a combination of nature vs. nurture
-the family is also changing
-17% married with children
-13.9% lone parents
200630% married without children
39% married with children
-common law is creeping in (people who live together but don’t get married)
-blended families:
-man gets divorced and gets custody of his kids
-woman gets divorced and has her kids
-they get married and blend their families together
1950s traditional nuclear family was called the Cleavor model (refers to an old sitcom – husband, wife, 2 boys)
-there was a husband who worked, a wife who stayed at home and did housework and looked after the
kids
-it was the first and only marriage for both
-therefore this is the traditional nuclear family
-today, the traditional nuclear family is a minority family type in Canadian households
-many people say the family is the fundamental unit of society and that social health depends on the family
- controversy: the traditional nuclear family reproduces the class hierarchy, and has been unfriendly to women
Theoretical outlooks on family:
-the family performs several functions
-from functional analysis:
-responsible for regulating sexual activity: what is legitimate and permitted
-economic cooperation: in the past men were stronger and women were incapacitated
when pregnant
-reproduction: in the past, having children was you old age security
-in the past, if you had lots of children, when you get old they will look after you
-thus, there was an economic incentive to have kids - there’s a tendency now not to look after their parents when they get old – just
put them in an old age home
-socialization
-emotion support
Socialization:
-family is the first and most important source of primary socialization
-parents teach their children how to integrate into society and how to contribute to society, while looking
after themselves
- sometimes parents have a hard time with this when their kids reach their teenage years and
start to become more independent, and parents become a bit scared
-sometimes children socialize their parents
-siblings socialize each other (especially older brothers and sisters)
-all of this comes free of charge to society
Regulation of sex activity:
-every culture does this
-marriage is encouraged in order to maintain kinship organization with extended family
- kinship organization/network = aunt’s uncles, grandparents, cousins, etc.
-the fundamental unit of any kinship network is the family
-the transmission of property is part of the family
-the incest taboo forbids sexual relations or marriage between certain kin
-some variation in this cross-culturally
-some break it under some special circumstances
Matrilineal Navajo:
-Navajo = aboringinal people, first nations people in America, located in Arizona and New Mexico
- Matrilineal = traces descent through the mother’s line
-Matrilineal Navajo say that sexual relations with any of the mother’s relatives is forbidden
-Canada has a bilateral system
-we trace descent through both mother and father
- for us, the incest taboo applies to both sides
-Patralineal = trace descent through the father
-bilateraltaboo on both sides but more on close family like aunts, uncles, grandparents, siblings
- Inca (Mexican), Hawaiian, ancient Egypt – permitted brother and sister marriage
Hawaii: nobility – brother and sister marriage – wanted to keep royal lineage
Ancient Egypt:
- same thing
- brother/sister marriage permitted in the royal family
Inca:
-violate incest taboo
-in Mexico
-when Europeans (notably the Spanish) arrived they destroyed society
- Inca civilization permitted brother/sister marriages, especially in leading families – intended to keep the royal
family pure
Why do we have this regulation of sexual activity? probably both nature and nurture are involved
- Nature
- the incest taboo rules out the possibility of recessive genes becoming too frequent - recessive gene: a gene that transmits an undesirable trait
-in order for the trait to be expressed, both mother and father have to possess it (need to
inherit the same recessive gene from both parents)
-therefore, you’re more likely to get it when you marry a close relative
Hybrid Vigour: people that marry other people (unrelated)
- children tend to be more healthy
- Nurture
- prohibition minimizes/reduces sexual competition in the family
- sexual regulation defines kinship rights and obligations, and it prevents the family from collapsing into
chaos (a social reason)
- another social reason – the incest taboo forces people to marry outside of family and form alliances with
other groups (therefore, more likely to survive) – doesn’t apply as much nowadays
-ex. in tribal and agricultural societies
-marrying outside of family led to broader alliances
Social placement:
-the family is not biologically necessary for people to reproduce
-pair bond both male and female stick around and raise their young
-therefore if two people are doing it, it will be more successful than if only one
-fairly common in animal species as well as in humans
-the family isn’t biologically necessary for reproduction, but it helps reproduction and
makes it more successful
- the family provides social placement
-social identity is transferred from parents to children
-social identity can also be based on race, ethnicity, religion, social class
-these are given to you at birth through the family
-thus there is a preference for “legitimate birth”
-it provides a stable platform for transmitting social identity (knowing who they come from)
-also important in terms of inheritance rights – parent property is passed on to their children
Material and Economic security:
-we often find that the rest of the world doesn’t care about you but when push comes to shove the family provides
financial support, physical protection, and emotional support
-therefore they will help when no one else will
- the family is also a place of violence and conflict (paradox) – the family as a paradox
- domestic violence
Health:
- people who live in families live longer (especially men)
-unmarried men live ~8 years less
-therefore, the family is a paradox
-it will do things for you in times of crisis but it can also be a violent place to live
Economic cooperation:
-families pool their resources
-parents throw their resources together
-they support their children
-on occasion, children support their aging parents
-men share their income with their wife and vice versa
-sexual division of labourcomplimentarity; men and women complement each other
-not as much today as in the past – this was more frequent in the past, before technology
-in agrarian past, the sexual division of labour had more complemetarity to it
-one of the reasons why nuclear families are not as complementary is because women don’t need men as much -even today, women tend to do lighter, more domestic work whereas men do less frequent strength jobs (ie.
shovelling the driveway)
-Functionalism and various aspects of functionalism:
-several dimensions of socialization
-regulation of sexual activity
-social placement
-material and emotional security
Economic cooperation:
-family is a place where you find particularism and affect (the family provides emotional support) as said by
Parsons
-there are rewards of affect when raising children
-the family is based on emotions
-people within the family relate to each other emotionally
-therefore, the family is different from the larger society
-family is treated differently and given better treatment
-the larger society is treated with universalism/impersonality – in the wider world, you’re treated with more
impersonality
-the family pools their resources and the parents support their children
-relationships between parents (especially mothers) and their children are very close
-mothers can divorce their husbands and never see them again but the children and their mothers usually don’t
break up
-parents support children emotionally, physically, and materially
-sometimes children support their parents in old age – not as common in modern societies as it is in
traditional societies
-there is also sexual division of labour – men did strength work that women couldn’t do; the introduction of
appliances eliminated this division
-not as important as it used to be
-with the introduction of modern appliances, the difference between the strength of men and women is
not as important
-complementaritydivision of labour; men and women do certain work, and that work complements
each other
Critical evaluation:
-the functional approach tends to overlook the diversity of family life
-the critics say other institutions can play the same role as the family
-the functional approach also tends to overlook the problems of married life
-ex. violence and conflict is also common in the family
-the family is a paradox (has both positive and negative characteristics)
-functionalists tend to emphasize the positive
-ex. Japan in 1970
-20% of Japanese women haven’t married by the age of 30
-today, 40% of Japanese women haven’t married by the age of 30
Why? – Many people say because of Patriarchy; the Japanese family is more patriarchal
than the typical North American family
-North America is not so patriarchal
-the marriage rate is going down here as well (NA)
-poor people decide to stay single
-women want to pursue their career
-there is also the option of in vitro fertilization
-men are not as inclined to marriage as they once were, because they say family law is biased against men
-men are denied visitation rights etc. -some men try to get around this by pre-nups
-a pre-nuptial agreement in which if divorce takes place, you divide the assets according to the pre-nup
- even pre-nups are falling into trouble becase some people hide their assets
Conflict and feminist theorist approach to the family:
- feminist and conflict theorists are critical of the family
- a theoretical approach that looks at the way family life perpetuates inequality = the social reproduction of
inequality
-the family is a situation in which inequality is inherited, and people who are born into a poor family are
more likely to remain poor
-people inherit the social standing of their parents (although there can be some upward mobility)
-Engle’s book: the origins of the family
- Engel says that the origin of the family arose out of the need of higher class men who wanted to
transmit their property to their sons
- the family concentrates wealth and reproduces/creates a class structure for generations to follow
-functionalist say the family gives people an identity and that people need an identity
-conflict theorists say that part of this identity is economic, and what the family does is perpetuate economic
inequality
- a 2 defect with the family, according to conflict and feminist theory, is patriarchy
- the family promotes patriarchy
- men can identify their heir’s through the sexual control of women
- the family transforms women into the economic and sexual property of men
- this refers to the traditional nuclear family
- a century ago, the wife belonged to the husband
- today it is said that women still bear the major responsibility of child and housework
- Canadian women with at least 1 child spend at least 5.3 hours of housework per day, husbands spend 3
hours per day
rd
- the 3 problem with families: the family perpetuates racial and ethnic categories
- these persist over time because people tend to marry other people like themselves
- it’s true that people do tend to marry within their group (called endogamy)
- marrying outside your group = exogamy
- in a multicultural society like Canada, there are trends towards more intermarriage
- Japanese Canadians – about 50% of them have intermarried
- this also applies to Jewish people – many are intermarried
- some Euro Canadians as well
Critique of Conflict and Feminist Theories
- a family has many faults, according to the conflict and feminist approach
- one criticism: when the communist revolution took place in the Soviet Union, it abolished the family
- they had to reinstate it because things didn’t work out (children were out of control, etc.)
- the family is extremely important when it comes to socializing children
- another criticism: has to do with the notion that the family perpetuates racial and ethnic hierarchies
- feminists and conflict theorists see this as negative
- then how do they square that with their approval and support of multiculturalism, which is based on the
retention on racial and ethnic and country of origin identities – when you take a position, you have to be
consistent with your ideas, can’t be contradictory
- a problem is the patriarchy argument in connection with
More
Less