Class Notes (837,532)
Canada (510,303)
Business (634)
BUSI 2701 (24)
Lecture

Notes L 5.docx

5 Pages
53 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Business
Course
BUSI 2701
Professor
petercowan
Semester
Fall

Description
Lecture 5 What is the Political Reality of Int Trade - Free trade occurs when govt do not attempt to restrict corp/ consumers can legally buy from another country or what they can legally sell to another country - Many nations nominally into free trade, govt still intervenes in int trade for pol reasons Why do Govts Intervene in Markets? 1) Pol arguments – concerned with protecting the interests of certain groups within nation (normally producers) often at the expense of other groups (normally consumers) 2) Econ arguments – concerned about boosting the overall wealth of a nation – benefits both prod and consumers What Are Political Arguments for Govt Intervention? - Protecting jobs: the mstn common pol reason for trade restrictions o Results from political pressure by unions or industries that are “threatened” by more efficient foreign producers, and have more political clout than consumers - Japans farmers oppose pacific free trade talks o Nov 12 2010 NY times o Hiroko tabuchi, makiko inoue contributed reporting form Tokyo o The idea of a vast free trade zone of pacific countries pits Japan’s farmers, who benefit from tariffs, against the country’s exporters - Protecting industries, deemed important for national security - industries like aerospace or electronics are often protected because they are deemed important for national security o Canada has provisions that allow it to deem some govt contracts not open to foreign companies bids  Canadian defence firms often lobby the govt to apply these provisions for various contracts although they are generally not successful  Municipal govts restrict procurement to local entities (currently a CETA negotiation issue) o Prevent state owned firms influence (TPP issue: Malaysia) - Retailing against unfair foreign competition – when govt take, or threaten to take specific actions, when other countries fail to remove trade barriers o WTO rulings in favour of Canada re country of origin labelling, but US not complying yet, therefore o Ottawa is warning it may impose tariffs on everything from orange juice to bread if the US doesn’t change a meat labelling policy targeted at Canadian beef (CBC News, June 2013) - Protecting consumer form dangerous products – limit unsafe products (lead toys, mad cow) - Furthering the goals of foreign policy, preferential trade terms can be granted to countries that a govt wants to build a strong relationship with, provision of most favoured nation status to China in the 1990’s by the US (prior to Chinas entry into the WTO) or o Trade policy can also be used to punish rogue states  The helms burton act (re Cuba) and the D’Amato Act (re Iran and Libiya sanctions) of 1996  Current trade embargo on Iran/North Korea  Removal of barriers for Myanmar o Ex  Oct 4,2011 NY Times China Criticizes US Senates Currency Manipulation Bill - Protecting or promoting the human rights of individuals in exporting countries o USA granted China MFN (most favoured nation) - Influencing environmental stds in exporting countreis – through regulatory approval processes: Keystone pipeline for ex Obamas stmts
More Less

Related notes for BUSI 2701

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit