Class Notes (834,049)
Canada (508,296)
Business (634)
BUSI 4705 (8)
Lecture

Asbestos_essay1.docx

5 Pages
46 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Business
Course
BUSI 4705
Professor
Diane H Arnold
Semester
Fall

Description
Name: Lupita Ardhyaningrum Student Number: 100807173 BUSI 4705 Business Ethics Canada’s Asbestos Industry and Its Underlying Ethical Issues Individuals, corporations, organizations, and government, continuously make choices that can be judged under ethical standards. Various choices that are made can either be ethical or unethical due to many factors. The case study of Jeffery Mine is a depiction of how correlated stakeholders’ ambitious self-interests can conflict with societies’ ethical principles and morality. This paper will focus on the underlying issue of the case and set of actions that should be taken by each stakeholder. The action plan is intended to address the main ethical disagreements in the case. As it has already been stated in the case study, the provincial government of Quebec had proposed to loan the Asbestos mining company, Jeffery Mine for $58 million dollars to revive the dying industry of Asbestos. The government believed that the loan will help create new employments for the population in that area and that Asbestos will pose no danger to human if it’s properly used and well taken care of. In addition to that, federal government defends the idea that Canadian industry should be protected. The problem of the case study is that, whether or not it is ethical and morally acceptable to export an illegal and hazardous mineral that —in the long term—can trigger asbestos related diseases such as lung cancer to developing countries that have not yet banned the use of Asbestos. From my personal point of view, I think it is indeed unethical for the Canadian government to provide the $58 million loan to rebuild the Asbestos mining industry. The solution to this ethical problem is to cancel out the loan of $58 million dollar for Jeffery Mine. Therefore I have created an all-things-considered best action plan for the four major stakeholders. The Asbestos mining company, Jeffery Mine (including the senior executives and the shareholders) should do the following: a) First off, the company needs to reevaluate and reassess the costs and benefits of conducting business in this industry. What are the chances that the business will likely to succeed considering the fact that it has to deal with recognized hazardous minerals in which countries worldwide ban the use of it? In the past the company has filed bankruptcy there I believe that Jeffery Mine should not make the same mistake twice. It is best for the company to put an end to the Asbestos industry. b) Instead, with the connections they already have in developing countries, Jeffery Mine should look for better alternatives such as start investing in another potential industry that does not involve with exporting dubious/illegal substances. c) The company executives and shareholders should understand how social corporate responsibility is crucial to the survival of businesses. Jeffery mine should realize that it might make profit in the short run, however in the long run they will have to face the consequences for disregarding the fact that asbestos is harmful. They might have to tackle issues that pertain to the asbestosis diseases such as legal measures taken by victims. Growing recognition of having good ethics can have a positive economic impact on the performance of companies and vice versa. The main obstacles to be encountered would be the corporate executives neglecting and not cooperating to the best alternative solutions provided. It is very likely that they will uphold what they consider is right and remain pursing their self-interests. The worse scenario, they will propose another loan in the future. To overcome these obstacles, Government should interfere by providing new policies and rules to put an end for the Asbestos industry. That way, Jeffery Mine will be able to diversify the company’s business. The second stakeholder in this case would be the provincial and federal government of Canada. An action plan for them would be: a) politics should not win over principles and ethics therefore they should cancel out the loan to reopen the asbestos mine. It is mainly because Canada carries a moral obligation to close down this ind
More Less

Related notes for BUSI 4705

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit