LAWS 3506 Lecture Notes - Lecture 7: Patently Unreasonable, Ouster Clause, Canadian Union Of Public Employees

56 views6 pages

Document Summary

Judicial review is the means by which the courts supervise those who exercise statutory powers, to ensure that they do not overstep their legal authority. The function of judicial review is therefore to ensure the legality, the reasonableness and the fairness of the admin process and its outcomes. The appropriate level of deference determines the standard to be used for the review. A lot of deference means a court should only interfere if the decision was patently unreasonable. Minimum deference means a court should interfere if the decision was incorrect. A court hearing an application for judicial review cannot simply reverse or set aside a decision because the court might come to a different outcome. Decision-makers are entitled to a level of deference (a lot or little) Scc said there are three standards of review tanging from the highly deferential to the least deferential. The three levels of deference or standards of review are: (p. 7/70)

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents