LAWS 3506 Lecture 11: Lecture 11

• School: Carleton University
• Department: Law
• Course: LAWS 3506
• Professor: Bahaa Sunallah

Document Summary

Lecture 11 - the standard of review on questions of procedural fairness & the. Standard of review procedural fairness: dunsmuir v new brunswick (2008, correctness more exacting, no deference, reasonableness heightened deference, rage of acceptable answers. In order to determine the standard of review: precedence: existing jurisprudence, contextual factors, including nature of the question. It knows the circumstances in particular proceedings before it. It has expertise in the dynamics of labour relations and has policy appreciation. Mission institution v. khela, 2014 scc 24: decision-makers may be accorded deference o(cid:374) pa(cid:396)ti(cid:272)ula(cid:396) aspe(cid:272)ts of the la(cid:396)ge(cid:396) (cid:862)dut(cid:455) of p(cid:396)o(cid:272)edu(cid:396)al fai(cid:396)(cid:374)ess(cid:863), (cid:449)he(cid:396)e, fact-d(cid:396)i(cid:448)e(cid:374) judg(cid:373)e(cid:374)t (cid:272)all; de(cid:272)isio(cid:374) (cid:373)ake(cid:396) has e(cid:454)pe(cid:396)tise; tatute has (cid:863)(cid:271)uilt-i(cid:374)(cid:863) indicators of discretion. This is where correctness begins, and ends: however, the court will show deference to the decision-maker to decide the level of procedural protections an applicant has and whether she knew the case against her.