LAWS 2908 Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Ratio Decidendi, Well-Founded Relation, Canadian Civil Liberties Association
19 Oct 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Task: read the case of febles v canada (citizenship and immigration), posted in the tutorials material on culearn. 2014 scc 68 (the date, court level, the # of case that the scc discussed in 2014) 2014 scc 68: draft a case brief of the febles case containing the following elements: Identify the parties to the case, the nature of the claim and which judges formed part of the majority and dissenting judgments. Minister of citizenship and immigration, respondent, and amnesty international, United nations high commissioner for refugees, canadian association of refugee. Lawyers, canadian council for refugees and canadian civil liberties association, Interveners. (interveners are people selected by the court to give the court their opinion) Find in the summary, the first few lines. Appeal by febels, asking to dismiss the motion for judicial review. You do(cid:374)"t (cid:374)eed to (cid:373)e(cid:374)tio(cid:374) the lower courts. Majority judges: mclachlin c. j and lebel, rothstein, moldaver and wagner jj.
