LAWS 3003 Lecture Notes - Lecture 13: Inequality Of Bargaining Power, Rebuttable Presumption, Unconscionability
24 Apr 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Final exam info: 302 exam room (2pm fri. april 20th, cover the material from week 8-week 12, no questions on weeks 2-6. Tercon contractors ltd. v. b. c: facts: b. c. issued a request for expressions of interest for the design and construction of a highway. In response, 6 teams including tercon and brentwood made submissions for the project. A few months later, bc told the 6 teams that it now wanted to design the highway themselves but requested proposals for the construction (second round). Only open for the original 6 proponents, so the 6 proponents made a second bid. One of the bidders, a company named brentwood, joined into a joint venture with another company because they did not have any experience in drilling or blasting needed to make the highway. Both the minority and the majority are agreed that the test for dealing with exclusion clauses is the right test.
