Class Notes (835,376)
Canada (509,147)
Psychology (2,710)
PSYC 2400 (274)
Lecture 18

PSYC 2400E - Lecture 18 - March 19, 2013.docx

4 Pages
79 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 2400
Professor
Julie Dempsey
Semester
Winter

Description
Tuesday, March 19, 2013 PSYC 2400 - Winter 2013 Lecture 18 Fitness to Stand Trial and Criminal Responsibility Today’s Class • Fitness to stand trial • Canada’s insanity standard • Cases of successful and unsuccessful in using a mental disorder as a defence • Automatism • Options for treating mentally ill offenders Presumptions in Canada’s Legal System • Elements that must be present for criminal guilt: – Actus reus: A wrongful deed • You have to actually commit an act against the law – Mens rea: Criminal intent • Do people actually know what they are doing? • If you know what you are doing, then you are responsible for your actions • If they couldn’t understand that what they were doing was wrong, then they shouldn’t be punished • Must be found beyond a reasonable doubt for a guilty verdict to be reached Fitness to Stand Trial • Unfit to stand trial: An inability to conduct a defense at any stage of the proceedings on account of a mental disorder • Present state of mind at the time of trial Fitness Standard • Unfit to stand trial if (due to mental disorder) unable to: – Understand nature or object of proceedings • Don’t understand why they are there, why there is a jury – Understand possible consequences of the proceedings • Don’t understand what their decisions can cause – Communicate with counsel • Must be able to recount the basic facts of their case • Time limit on evaluation – 5 day limit – So that they aren’t holding on to people for longer than necessary – Extensions are possible, to 30 days, with a maximum of 60 days • May be raised at various stages of the proceedings – At the start, during sentencing, etc. – Defense or crown can raise issue of unfitness -> that party has responsibility to prove unfit Four Core Elements 1. Focus is on defendant’s present ability 2. Focus is on capacity not willingness – Are they able to communicate? 3. Possess a reasonable knowledge 4. Emphasis is on cognitive functioning and not on mental disorder – Just because you have a mental disorder doesn’t mean that’s the reason you committed the crime – Only counts when the disorder inhibited your functioning How does Canada determine who is unfit? • Only medical practitioners – Psychiatrist or medical doctor – Psychologists can help with assessment • Can make recommendations • Use screening tools – Then full examinations Fitness Instruments • Fitness Interview Test Revised (FIT-R) • High inter-rater reliability • Used often in Canada • Designed to assess key constructs • Semi-structured interview • Assessing the 3 principles • Tests factual knowledge • i.e., what does the judge do, what does the jury do? • Ability to participate • Responses rated on 3 point scale (0,1,2) • Lower the score, the more “fit” the person is • Determines the person’s capacity • No strict cut-off score • Structured-professional judgment • Competency Screening Test (CST) • 22 incomplete sentences • Measuring 3 constructs • 3 points scale (0,1,2) • Competency to Stand Trial Assessment Instrument (CAI) • Designed to accompany the CST • Semi-structured interview • Assessing 13 key functions • Ability to participate in trial • Statements with 2-3 questions • Can ask follow up questions • Rated 1 to 5 • Higher grade is better, less mental impairment
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 2400

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit