Class Notes (838,243)
Canada (510,789)
Psychology (2,716)
PSYC 2400 (274)
Adelle Forth (114)
Lecture 7

Lecture 7

10 Pages
63 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 2400
Professor
Adelle Forth
Semester
Winter

Description
Lecture 7—Polygraph: Lie Detector? Tuesday, January 25, 2011 - Experimental research on false confessions, polygraphs- today - Guest speaker- malingering mental disorders- Thursday - Will finish Ch. 4 next Tuesday, and start eyewitness testimonies *Questions - 1. The main issue in the case Brown v. Mississippi (1936) was: o a) use of physical coercion to obtain confession - 2. During an interrogation an innocent suspect confesses to a crime because they are told that members of their family will be harmed if they do not confess. This is an example of a: o e) coerced-compliant false confession - False confessions in the lab o One of the first studies done on false confessions- Kassin and Kiechel’s computer key study o Very little research has been done in this area- lots of open spots for employment- difficult to research o Asked to come to lab, deception was used (told to type letters quickly- measure of reaction time)- someone else arrived at the same time, but he/she was a confederate o Tester had to read out loud the letter while you type them o *Manipulated how plausible a mistake might be made—read letters quickly or slowly o Letter Z came up- computer crashed o *Warned you beforehand not to hit the alt button (adjacent to Z)—possible your finger slipped  If you hit Alt button, all data will crash and you will lose data o Suspect was accused of messing up experiment o *Vulnerability was manipulated as was the presence of false evidence  Confederate was “waiting for next turn”—said he/she saw the suspect hit the key vs. didn’t see anything o *Fast pace- more likely to make a mistake o Recorded four things:  1. Sign this confession to say you hit the Alt key—false confession • If you were in fast pace and confederate said he/she saw you do it, 100% signed false confession  2. Internalization- experimenter left room, next subject came in (another confederate)- I heard something happen from the other room. If participant said he/she hit the wrong key in the experiment, he/she is taking ownership. • Not as high as signing false confession • But still, in fast condition with false evidence, said he/she did something wrong • *This has nothing to do with the experiment- actually believes he/she did it  3. Confabulation- grad student came back and printed off the list of numbers the suspect typed in- come in and explain how you made that error—confabulation is making up a story about touching the Alt key (looked up and finger slipped, etc.) • *Most related to false confessions • *35% of students confabulated • *False evidence played a big role in this o Factors: manipulated false evidence, typing fast/slow—measured false confession, internalization, confabulation - Experimental false confession paradigm: important factors (Klavier et al., 2008)- SFU o Interested in different factors (no false evidence, witness, typing pace)- same scenario o Suggestibility Scale (book)*-- how suggestible you are to misleading information  How likely you are to incorporate misleading information  One of the only scales with reliability/validity in this context o Used minimization and maximization techniques o Typing letters on computer o *Plausibility varied—either accused you of hitting Alt or Esc key o *Also manipulated plausibility by asking you to go fast or slow o Mini-interrogation  Minimization: I know it was just an accident, several people before you made a similar accident.  Maximization: I’ve run 50 people in this experiment. Not one has screwed up the way you screwed up. Why did you do this? o *Low plausibility would still sometimes sign false confession, but none of them internalized (confederate walked in door, asked what happened) o *High plausibility increased likelihood of confessing, higher rates of internalization  Also interesting: most of them were more susceptible to minimization techniques o *This study has not been replicated. Hard to determine how it would apply to real world  Here, all suspects are innocent. Hard to relate to real world when some are guilty  Also, there are no consequences in this study.  The stress would go up a little in study, but not the magnitude of stress you would feel if you’re isolated and being accused of crime  Length of interrogation was only 20 minutes (not like 18 hours)  Threats were minimal o But it’s very difficult to get sources of data from real world - Polygraph o History of using physiological measures to determine whether someone is lying or not  China: suspects on the stand chew dry rice, spit it out. If the rice is still dry, you’re guilty (if you’re anxious, mouth will go dry).  Marston-1917: first attempt in NA to use physiological measures as lie detector- based on blood pressure • Frye v. United States- Frye killed physician, charged with nd 2 degree murder • His defence hired Marston to do a polygraph to see if he was guilty or innocent • Defence tried to call Marston to the stand- conclusion: Frye was innocent • Ruling: this blood pressure test did not have sufficient scientific reliability, would not be admitted to court • **Frye standard: whether something new can or cannot be admitted to court o Wonder Woman- Lasso of Truth  Marston wrote this Wonder Woman comic strip- she captures you, asks you questions with the lasso, must tell the truth o Polygraph- writing many o Physiological tool, measures physiological changes  First- blood pressure  Later- included other measures • Respiration, skin conductance, amount of sweat on skin o Polygraph examination combines polygraph and interrogation- looking at responses to specific questions o Originally was small, could fit in briefcase so examiner could take it anywhere, set up a polygraph o Used to include little pens that would print out responses—now it’s digitized (in laptop computer) o Measure chest (respiration)—things set around chest in upper chest, across stomach (because some people breathe more from chest/stomach) o Photo cell on finger for blood pressure/cuff o Electrodes on palms/fingers for skin conductance (sweat) o Example of polygraph exam  2 respiration channels (upper chest and stomach)—took a small second breath, held breath, etc.  Electrodermal activity (sweat on skin)—at question 9, huge jump in waves- large skin conductance response (this was at the same time as holding the breath)  2 blood pressures (hard to see change)  Could compare responses for questions 8 and 9- look at questions, try to decide whether person is innocent or guilty - *Question* o * If you were accused of a crime, would you be willing to take a polygraph to clear yourself?  A) Yes  B) No  C) Depends on if I am innocent or guilty o 24% said yes, 59% said no, 18% said depends o *It might help you get out of interrogation, though it wouldn’t finish the case and prove you innocent - *What is the key problem with using a polygraph? o Physiological responses vary if you’re just anxious or nervous (though not guilty)- would give the wrong idea o You’re being accused—feel fear- could also mimic the feeling of anxiety o There may be some personality types that are cool, calm and collected- don’t feel remorse- would pass the test even if they’re guilty - Black pad- put it under feet, you sit on it—measures shifting in seat/shifting of feet- would also notice if you clench your butt muscles - Uses of polygraph o Not admissible in Canada  R v. Béland, 1987 • 3 people plotting armed robbery • 2 people ratted on other 2 • Defence wanted polygraph on others to show they were lying • Not accepted in Canada o Varies in U.S.  In many states if the prosecution and defence agree, it can be entered in the court  But if the defence says no, the prosecution can’t enter it in court o Not admissible in U.K. o Police investigations o Employment and screening  Used to be used a lot, particularly in US  Polygraph Protection Act in 1988 (banned)  Before then, if you were applying for job, you would have to take polygraph- HUGE market- lots of work  Not for specific incident, like police investigation—asking questions about drinking on the job, stealing from employer, whether he/she abuses sick days—general character  Now it’s still used for some employment screening, but for particular jobs—RCMP, CSIS, FBI, CIA, etc. - Polygraph: use with sexual offenders o Treatment  Most of offenders will deny/minimize number of crimes they commit  Average number of offences were 12 pre-polygraph  After polygraph- said 12 (lying)- 15 (lying)- 20 (lying)- kept on going  Average number across the sample went up to 137 after polygraph  But maybe the 137 is an overestimate- the offenders want to get out of the investigation so they give a big number  Mainly in the States o Monitoring offenders  After they get released into community, conditional release (parole)  Every six weeks, take a polygraph  Examiner asks whether the offender’s been to a public swimming pool, associated with minors, had deviant sexual fantasies, etc.  If they’re deemed deceptive, phone parole and say the client is violating conditions  This is in the States- very popular o Study by English et al.  Like the treatment issue
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 2400

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit