Class Notes (837,548)
Canada (510,312)
Psychology (2,710)
PSYC 2600 (183)
Chris Motz (27)
Lecture 18

Lecture 18.doc

6 Pages
49 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 2600
Professor
Chris Motz
Semester
Winter

Description
Lecture 18 Thursday, March 17, 2011 - starting the Social/Cultural Domain (should have started on Tuesday) - And we’ll finish the last set of notes - **Final exam essay question** - Pictures of students—specifically working in the area of the juxtaposition between personality and social psychology - These two are incredibly intertwined—impossible to talk about one without the other—Walter Mischel (account for situation in personality), social psychology needs to account for personality - The Society for Personality and Social Psychology is probably one of the largest groups - Final Exam Essay  Write legibly  Professor will mark the exam essay questions  Single-space  Given single essay booklet (about 10 pages, single-sided)  But you can write on the back of pages  Most people are fine with this—if you need more, can ask for another. o Learning objective  Essay question has been posted on course website since before reading week  The question is one of those big-picture questions  “What is the definition of personality?” is the essence of the question. Getting you to think about ideas from across the whole semester.  It’s comprehensive, not cumulative—you get to go back and be very selective. Choose what you’re going to discuss in your answer.  A lot of the smaller details will naturally fade over time. Professor will look at the big picture—so whatever small details you use will have to tie into that big picture.  Show that you can have informed conversation about personality. o Time frame  1) Start by writing the essay outline. • On the back of the front cover of the booklet, jot down the points.  2) Multiple choice • Worth 2/3 of the mark of the final exam (more than the essay) • 80 questions—will take an hour and a half to two hours.  3) Essay • Could vary the time according to the time limit, whereas multiple choice will take the same amount of time no matter what • Professor will mark the papers with the expectation that you’ve only had an hour to write this. Will only expect so much detail, expansion, explanation. • Key: be selective (in what you choose to talk about—don’t just do information dunk) and focused (in the presentation of the information) • Mantra: Be selective and focused o Outline  1) Larsen and Buss definition of personality • Ch. 1—they break it down, elaborate, discuss • Start with this • Quote and discuss—should take 5-6 minutes. • You get to choose which aspects are important • Could have a sentence or two to open up the subject of the essay, but you could get straight into the definition.  2) Costa and McCrae’s Five Factor Theory • 5-6 minutes • THEORY, not the model • Draw it and discuss • What is the theory? How were Costa and McCrae defining personality through the theory? • *Link this to the six domains? • Could have a quick point about the dynamic processes (arrows)  3) Introduction to 6 Domains of Knowledge • 1-2 minutes • Don’t even bother to list them off. In the next section, we’ll go through each of them. • Here, just introduce to the idea of thee six domains • What do we mean by six domains of knowledge?  4) For Each Domain: 7 minutes—6 x 7=42 • Name it • Connect it to FFT o Ex. Dispositional domain—basic tendencies component of FFT. • Big Questions o Ex. Biological domain—is there connection between physiology and personality (and subsequent behaviour)? To what extent is personality heritable? To what extent are evolutionary forces still influencing our behaviour today? o That broke down the big questions into the three chapters of biological domain. Could do it this way. o About 2-3 questions are appropriate. • Research example o Talk about a study (not a case study—talk about research) o Ex. Zuckerman and Coolman, Geen, Eisenberg and Williams, Baldwin, etc. o One is sufficient o Details—what it was about/what they were trying to do/hypothesis, what did they do, what did they find? o Don’t need to remember researcher names, dates, or numbers o Relate this back to personality. How does it connect back to the domain? What does it tell us about people?  5) Conclusion (if there’s time) • 4-7 minutes • **ONLY IF there’s time. o Point form?  No.  Does not communicate the fullness of the idea  Relying upon the reader to insert some meaning  But if you’re running out of time, fine.  **Also, if you run out of time and don’t finish writing about the
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 2600

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit