PHIL 210 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Straw Man, Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc, Modus Tollens

67 views1 pages

Document Summary

Lecture 4 fallacies - when arguments turn bad. Ad hominem: aka arguments against the man, it is choosing to attack the person making the argument rather than addressing the points raised in the argument itelf. Affirming the consequent: an invalid argument in the form of if p then q (premise 1), Q is true (premise 2), therefore p is true (conclusion) this invalid form is often confused with the valid form modus ponens. Equivocation: a fallacy that involves changing the definition of terms in different premises or conclusions of a single argument. Evidential fallacies: an argument that fails to show its conclusion to be reasonably likely because the state of information is too weak to support the conclusion. Fallacies: unreliable methods of reasoning (either accidental or intentional) that result in faulty argumentation. False dichotomy: the dilemma of suggesting that there are only two options left when in fact, many other options exist.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents