Class Notes (838,045)
Canada (510,649)
Philosophy (95)
PHIL 2810 (9)
Lecture

March 14th, 2013.docx

3 Pages
110 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHIL 2810
Professor
Kristin Borgerson
Semester
Winter

Description
March 14th, 2013 March-14-13 10:12 AM Possible values  Respect o For the sincerity and intelligence of people with whom one reasonably disagrees  A problem with this is that it will more likely require a revision of views, she thinks that if you really respect the views of somebody else, at the end of the day it will require the revision of your own  Epistemic humility o Humility about what you know, in particular complex and difficult moral issues o Problem: doubt doesn't make the other perspective look any better, although they may scale back their own views a little bit, they will not switch their views completely and say that the other person's is right Values that could generate true compromise  Securing the safety or well-being of patients o Depends on likelihood of serious harm if referred or not referred o Important note for these physicians, the fetus is also considered to be one of their patients  So you could say that because the fetus is a patient and there is a commitment to securing the safety or well-being of patients, since referring the woman to another doctor for an abortion, there is pretty well a guarantee that you will lose one of your patients, however if you don't there is only the possibility of both being lost  Commitment to liberal neutrality o Statement that you can't impose any religious beliefs on patients because they may have different ones of their own o This commitment to neutrality must be stronger to the commitment to prevent abortions Justifying referral  Physicians professional choice o Physicians cannot make conscientious objections to their practices that violate established norms of the profession o You made the choice to become a physician, you have the ability to stop whenever you want, so you have to conform to the rules and norms of physicians  The view about scope would account for why conscientious objectors ought to make referral to IF Is the VAS morally justified  Recall VAS: Physicians cannot make conscientious objections to their practices that violate established norms of the profession  Reasons to support the VAS o Preserves the integrity of the profession o Preserves patient trust (norms are well established) o Physicians have consented to follow the norms by ch
More Less

Related notes for PHIL 2810

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit