Class Notes (834,037)
Canada (508,290)
Langara College (1,811)
Philosophy (29)
PHIL 1100 (28)
U.Abaci (28)
Lecture

Maxims- Duty to Moral Laws.docx

12 Pages
111 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHIL 1100
Professor
U.Abaci
Semester
Fall

Description
Maxims: Duty to Moral Laws  Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)  Deontology: the ethical view that moral value is determined by fulfilling one’s duty o Deon = Duty o What we ought to do o Universal o Reason  Kant attempts to establish the universal reason and morality  Those laws and foundations are a “priori” o A law that is a priori is one that we can be certain is true independently of its application to actual experience  Priori = prior to experience  Moral ideals function as commands  Pure reason vs. Change  Ethics o Meta (good?) o Normative (good behaviour?) o Application (abortion? Euthanasia?)  Top- down vs. Bottom-up  Kant uses a top-down approach (Normative  Descriptive)  Moral / Immoral / Non-moral  Motivist o Intentions  not a consequence  Kantian Ethics o The preeminent good, which we call moral, can therefore consist in nothing else than the conception of law itself, which certainly is only possible in a rational being. o Apply reason  Good Will o Intentions through good will o Good will = irreducible source of moral value o If you do actions with good will, then it is the right thing to do o Cannot use emotions to determine good and bad o Good even if it fails o Can be corrupted by inclinations o Reason reigns in good will  Imperatives  create a sense of moral obligation  what we ought to do o Reason and will + Maxims (Proposition) o Hypothetical (HI) + Categorical (CI) o Hypothetical Imperative = If P then Q. o Categorical Imperative = Example: Killing is wrong.  These statements do not need further justification. They are morally obligated.  No conditional or additional claims (P.)  Maxim: a moral law  Hypothetical Imperative: a moral maxim that does not express a value that one should pursue independently, instead, the action being commanded by the maxim is seen only as a means to something else o If ___ then ___. o If you want to be charitable, then you should help those less fortunate than you. o If you take that action then you will be charitable.  Duty o Choose between freedom or moral character  Categorical Imperative: a maxim that commands moral obligation independent of experience or consequences. It is derived from pure reason and always carries overriding value. o Don’t exploit people. Do not treat people as a mere means. Don’t kill people. o Command actions that are intrinsically good, not actions that are good as a means to something else  Categorical imperatives o Do X. o It is not optional o Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. o If you can’t universalize something, it is probably not the right thing to do. o Vigilante – not okay for parents to kill the killer of their child; not okay for everyone to do that  Universal Law Test o Assume the maxim is universal o 1) Formulate your maxim o 2) Universalize (Assume that the maxim is universal) o 3) Conceive of a world ruled by maxim o 4) Can you rationally will it? o If the answer is yes to #4, then your action is moral o You can conceive of such a world but cannot rationalize it… o Perfect duties: ones that I always must do o Imperfect duties: ones that I may choose how and when to do  Logical Form o Applicable to all rational agents o A moral action is one that a rational person can consistently universalize as a moral law o What determines the moral value is whether it is logically consistent for the action to be practiced by all women and men o Telling the truth is the morally right thing to do = consistent with real world o Not telling the truth is the morally right thing to do = not consistent o The belief that you are different/unique is an irrational belief o Suicide is morally wrong = logically inconsistent  Breaking a promise o Is it okay for me to break a promise? o Realistically, I am not in any position to pay my friend back but I need their money. Why don’t I ask them to borrow money and promise to pay them back? o Maxim: When I need money, I will borrow it and promise to repay it even though I know that I cannot do so. o We cannot in fact will this, it will not past #3 because we cannot conceive of a world of breaking a promise  a promise would be meaningless  no value in promise and it disappears o Can you conceive of a world where promises don’t exist? Fails #3 o Therefore, you have a perfect duty to keep your promises; that’s why you keep them not because you hurt people, world collapse, etc.  Cannot have logical contradiction  Stealing o Maxim: When I need a printer, I will steal a printer if I come across one in an empty room. o Does not pass Kant’s test o Ther
More Less

Related notes for PHIL 1100

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit