Class Notes (835,338)
Canada (509,112)
Langara College (1,809)
Philosophy (29)
PHIL 1100 (28)
U.Abaci (28)
Lecture

Ethical Relativism.docx

8 Pages
55 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHIL 1100
Professor
U.Abaci
Semester
Fall

Description
Ethical Relativism  Ethical Relativism: each person determines what is morally right o What I feel is right is right. What I feel is wrong is wrong. – Jean- Jacques Rousseau o The view that all moral values are relative to the individual or specific culture.  Ethical Subjectivism o The view that the ultimate moral authority is the individual or the “subject” o A person stealing someone else’s laptop and say they are ethical because they are acting in accordance with their own moral conviction o Does not guarantee a tolerant acceptance of the rights and interests of others o Moral anarchy  Descriptive ethics: an ethical approach that simply represents ethical beliefs without evaluating their accuracy or appropriateness (What is the case?)  Normative ethics: an ethical approach that attempts to prescribe what ethical behaviours should be accepted or become cultural norms (What ought to be the case?)  John Searle o It is often said that one cannot derive “ought” from “is”  no set of descriptive statements can entail and evaluative statement without the addition of an evaluative premise  Benedict – Cultural Relativism o Cultural relativism is ethical subjectivism on a societal level o Cultural norms determine what is ethically right and wrong o Moral values nothing more than agreement of various groups of people o If slavery or polygamy is a common practice in a certain culture, it is morally right for that culture o Your idea of good or bad has been programmed into you when you’re born in a particular culture  the culture determines what is right or wrong o Travellers – have different perspectives than us – not necessarily tied to cultural norms o In North America, wealth = success but a lot of the world does not think like this o Need to question to culture to recognize what it is  Benedict’s Argument o “The vast majority of the individuals in any group are shaped to the fashion of their culture.” o Moral values arise from social adaptation  Morality  “socially approved customs”  Values arise from social adaptations – passive, you are constantly adapting  There is a spectrum; some of us withstand pressure, some of us don’t  Values are neither superior or inferior to those of another o Modern civilization does not embody an evolutionary “pinnacle of human achievement” but rather “one entry in a long series of possible adjustments” o Not possible to say one “recipe” of culture is better than another, they just represent different ways people use to organize themselves into social groups o Your beliefs about morality, religion, etc. are dependent on the accident of your birth  Who you are is going to be different if you had a different set of parents  Not something you actively choose o “It is morally good” = “It is habitual”  Very similar to something like language; why do you speak English? It is accidental you speak English; you did not choose to speak it  Social adaptation to speak English  Actively choosing to learn another language – different from everyone else who only speaks English o Many people find the relativist view to be convincing  The Cultural Difference Argument o Usually explains why relativism can be true o 1) If there were an absol
More Less

Related notes for PHIL 1100

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit