CHEM 110 Lecture Notes - Lecture 15: Hadley V Baxendale, No Liability, Doctor Of Letters

14 views20 pages
lionel.angibeaud and 39534 others unlocked
CHEM 110 Full Course Notes
37
CHEM 110 Full Course Notes
Verified Note
37 documents

Document Summary

So use third measure: loss of amenity measure that trial judge came up . Windfall in other words: and expectancy limits reliance, if defendant can prove the k was unprofitable for the plaintiff. This concern with not giving too much is what we"re also dealing with in our next chapter: limitation of scope of liability. How do we protect the party in breach against excessive liability: no lia(cid:271)ilit(cid:455) fo(cid:396) (cid:272)o(cid:374)se(cid:395)ue(cid:374)(cid:272)es of the (cid:271)(cid:396)ea(cid:272)h that a(cid:396)e dee(cid:373)ed too (cid:862)(cid:396)e(cid:373)ote(cid:863, how does cvl code conceptualize/limit contractual liability, art 1607, art 1611, art 1613. Cml uses similar vocab to cvl (explicitly imported into it in 19th century: one of most important cases for this issue on cml side is hadley v baxandale. The creditor is entitled to damages for bodily, moral or material injury which is an immediate and direct consequence of the debtor"s default.