BUSA 391 Lecture Notes - Lecture 9: Malicious Falsehood, Promissory Note

38 views3 pages
Lecture Nine
Tort Law (cont.)
Injurious falsehood, slander of typo, slander of producting (something wrong with the quality of
your product and that’s why you shouldn’t buy it)
o Cola taste test wasn’t injurious falsehood, chilled their own brand, while other one was
cool to be less appealing
o Putting a penny in a glass of cola and showing that it disintegrates it, even though all
types of pop do the same damage is injurious falsehood
You have to have a false statement, defendant has to have wished harmed on the other party
Recklessness of the truth is sufficient to be malice (gossip)
Some torts are intentional, knowing that their action could cause that problem
Some torts are negligent, you always have to find what the duty of care was, if there is no duty
of care, the person is not liable of what happened next, if there was a duty of care (what is
expected) you have to check if the defendant met the standard of care; as a member of society
has a duty, a reasonable person
If the defendant did not meet the standard of care, its proved fault
You have to prove causation after being proven fault
You have to have some responsibility to behave to others in a certain way, if you misbehave (be
negligent), you must pay the consequences
Some situations you don’t have to prove
o If it is a strict liability offence, or if there is a statute saying it is a strict offence,
transporting dangerous materials
o When its strict liability you don’t have to show person who is at fault, you do have to
show their actions caused injuries
o If you can show that, if it’s a strict liability, they are liable without having to be at fault
o Strict liability, if a statute says it, if it deals with wild animals, if it meets rylands and
fletcher’s rule
In negligence, you should always follow the pattern, who’s the plaintiff, who’s the defendant, if
you know who they are, identify what kind of tort it is, may also be crimes, what duty or duties
of care does defendant have toward plaintiff, does his actions meet duty of care (duty of
occupier’s liabilityto take reasonable care...)
In our society when people are injured by other people’s behaviour, we want to compensate,
tort is about compensations of person who is injured, crime is about punishment of perpetrator
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 3 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

You have to have a false statement, defendant has to have wished harmed on the other party. Recklessness of the truth is sufficient to be malice (gossip) Some torts are intentional, knowing that their action could cause that problem. If the defendant did not meet the standard of care, its proved fault. You have to prove causation after being proven fault. You have to have some responsibility to behave to others in a certain way, if you misbehave (be negligent), you must pay the consequences. Some situations you don"t have to prove. In our society when people are injured by other people"s behaviour, we want to compensate, tort is about compensations of person who is injured, crime is about punishment of perpetrator. Situation in which two parties (multiple) make up their own law for the two of them, does not apply to anyone not within agreement, carry out a purpose of some sort.

Get access

Grade+
$10 USD/m
Billed $120 USD annually
Homework Help
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
40 Verified Answers
Study Guides
Booster Classes
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Homework Help
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
30 Verified Answers
Study Guides
Booster Classes