Class Notes (836,414)
Canada (509,777)
ECON 209 (122)
Lecture

ECON 209 Chapter 19.docx

8 Pages
79 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Economics (Arts)
Course
ECON 209
Professor
Paul Dickinson
Semester
Winter

Description
ECON 209 Chapter 19 – What Macroeconomics Is All About January 10, 2013 Macroeconomics: Study of the determination of econ aggregates (e.g. total output, total employment, the price level, rate of econ growth) – a broad perspective on how the market behaves  Results from activities in many diff markets and combined behaviour of millions of diff decision makers  Macroeconomists focus on 2 diff aspects of the econ: SHORT-RUN FLUCTUATIONS AND LONG-RUN ECON GROWTH 1. Short-run behaviour of macroecon variables and how gov’t policy can influence these variables (includes study of BUSINESS CYCLES) 2. Long-run behaviour of these variables (esp long-run path of aggregate output) – this is the study of econ growth, concerned w/ explaining how investment and tech change affect material living standards (in the long-run)  2 diff streams of research in macroecon: based EXPLICITLY on micro foundations (wages and prices are perfectly flexible) and based IMPLICITLY on micro foundations (wages and prices are slow to adjust – markets can be in diseq for longer periods of time)… WE ARE LOOKING AT THE SECOND APPROACH 19.1 Key Macroeconomic Variables Output and Income: OUTPUT GENERATES INCOME  Most comprehensive measure of nation’s overall level of econ activity is val of its total production of goods and services (nat’l product)  Nat’l product = nat’l income (val of total output = val of income claims generated by the production of that output) Aggregating total output: qtys of many diff goods are aggregated to measure total output – we add up $ vals of production of diff products to arrive at these totals… QTY OF TOTAL OUTPUT MEAUSRED IN $  Nominal nat’l income: total nat’l income measured in current dollars (a.k.a. current-dollar nat’l income) – dollar val of nat’l output  Change in this can be caused by a change in either physical qtys or prices on which it is based  To determine extent to which any change is due to qtys or prices: calculate REAL NAT’L INCOME: nat’l income measured in constant (base-period) $; changes only when qtys change (a.k.a. constant-dollar nat’l income)  Val of current output measured at constant prices – sum of qtys valued at base period prices  Comparing RNI from different yrs shows change in real output in the intervening period National income – recent history: One of the most commonly used methods of measuring nat’l income: GDP (can be measured in real or nominal terms; we focus on real)  Long-term econ growth – (+) trend (real output is increasing)  Short-term fluctuations around the trend  Business cycle: continual fluctuations of nat’l income around its long-term trend val (wave-like)  May include recessions and booms, as well as recovery periods Potential output and the output gap:  Nat’l output: what the econ actually produces  Potential output: what the econ would produce if all resources were employed at normal levels of utilization (a.k.a. full-umployment output) – Y* (actual output = Y)  Output gap: actual nat’l income – potential nat’l income (Y – Y*)  Recessionary gap: Y < Y*  Inflationary gap: Y > Y* Terminology of business cycles:  Trough: unemployed resources and a level of output that is low relative to econ’s capacity to produce – substantial amt of unused productive capacity, profits are low, econ prospects are grim (less investing)  Recovery: mvmt out of a trough – k is replaced; employment, income, consumer spending rise; expectations become more favourble  renewed investment… production can be increased w/ relative ease  Peak: recovery peaks at the top of the cycle – existing capacity used to a high degree; potential labour/raw materials shortages  costs AND prices rise so business remains profitable… followed by slowdowns in econ activity  Recessions: downturn in econ activity – output falls, so to does employment and household incomes; profits and therefore investment decrease (often defined precisely as as 2 consecutive quarters in which real GDP falls)… can turn into a DEPRESSION Why nat’l income matters: it is an important measure of econ performance  Long term growth (potential GDP is the most important)  Recessions: econ waste and human suffering  Booms: upward pressure on inflation  Long-run trend in real per capita nat’l income is an important determinant of improvements in society’s overall standard of living  Econ growth makes ppl materially better off on avg, it doesn’t necessarily make every individual better off (benefits are not shared equally) Employment, Unemployment, and the Labour Force:  Nat’l income and employment are closely related; either…  Employment must rise (most short-run changes accomplished this way)  Productivity (output/employee) must rise  Employment: # of ppl 15+ yrs of age who have jobs  Unemployment: # of ppl 15+ yrs of age who are not employed and are actively searching for a job  Unemployment rate = [# of ppl unemployed / # of ppl in the labour force] x 100 Frictional, structural, and cyclical unemployment:  Econ is at potential GDP: full employment (when unemployment is only frictional and structural)  Frictional unemployment: unemployment caused by the normal turnover of labour  Structural unemployment: unemployment due to mismatch btwn structure of the supplies of labour and structure of demands for labour  EVEN WHEN ECON IS AT “FULL EMPLOYMENT” SOME UNEMPLOYMENT EXISTS B/C OF NATURAL TURNOVER IN THE LABOUR MARKET AND MISMATCH BTWN JOBS AND WORKERS  Full employment: factors of production are being used at normal intensity, econ is at potential GDP  GDP < potential GDP = unemployment rises above its full-employment level  GDP > potential GDP = unemployment falls below its full-employment level  Cyclical unemployment: neither structural nor frictional, changes w/ fluctuations of the business cycle  Unemployment also has seasonal fluctuations (unemployment stats are seasonally adjusted) Employment and Unemployment – Recent History:  Employment has grown roughly in line w/ labour force since 1960  Short-term fluctuations have been substantial  Econ had been growing steadily in yrs up to 2008 (unemployment rate was lowest it had been in 30 yrs)  Late 2008: onset of recession; unemployment rate rose sharply  There has been a slight upward trend in the unemployment rate over the past 50 yrs Why unemployment matters: Unemployment has huge social significance  Human effort is least durable econ commodity  Loss of income associated w/ unemployment harms individuals (i.e. poverty)  Other of long-term unemployment include  Crime  Mental illness  Social unrest Productivity: Long-run growth of Canada’s econ has 3 general causes: 1. Level of employment has increased significantly 2. Stock of physical k has increased fairly steadily over time 3. Productivity in Canada has increased in almost every yr since 1960  Productivity: measure of amt of output econ produces per unit of input (we have several diff measures of productivity b/c there are many diff inputs in the econ)  Labour productivity: amt of real GDP produced per unit of labour employed (commonly used)  It is more accurate to express labour productivity in amt of real GDP/hour worked (instead of real GDP produced/employed worker) b/c avg # of hours worked per employed worker changes over time (fluctuation over the business cycle, long-term decline  There has been a significant increase in labour productivity over the past 3 decades  Real GDP/employed worker: avg annual growth rate of 1.1%  Real GDP/hour worked: avg annual rate of 1.3% Why productivity matters: single largest cause of rising material living standards over long periods of time  Short-run: changes in avg real incomes have more to do w/ fluctuations of business cycle than w/ changes in productivity  Upward trend in GDP comes in large part from rising productivity  Why is real income of the avg Canadian so much higher today than it was 50 yrs ago?  The avg Canadian worker today is way more productive than 50 yrs ago – better physical k, greater worker skills… therefore the purchasing pwr of the avg worker’s earnings are higher now Inflation and price level:
More Less

Related notes for ECON 209

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit