Class Notes (834,049)
Canada (508,296)
ECON 209 (122)
Lecture

ECON 209 Chapter 25.docx

5 Pages
121 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Economics (Arts)
Course
ECON 209
Professor
Paul Dickinson
Semester
Winter

Description
ECON 209 February 14, 2013 Chapter 25 – The Difference Between Short-Run and Long-Run Macroeconomics 25.1 Two Examples from Recent History Inflation and Interest Rates in Canada: The Bank of Canada’s 1990s policy to reduce inflation:  Higher inflation pushes up interest rates; lower inflation drives them back down (b/c inflation erodes the val of money and lenders need to be compensated)  To reduce inflation, the Bank had to reduce the growth rate of money, tightening up credit market conditions and driving up interest rates… HOW AN A POLICY THAT DRIVES UP INTEREST RATES REDUCE INFLATION?  You have to understand the different short-run and long-run effects of monetary policy  Short-run reduction in the liquidity of money  scarcer credit  rising real and nominal interest rates  firm investment and private big-ticket consumption decline  reduction in real GDP  unemployment rate rises  econ enters a recession  A monetary policy designed to reduce inflation is usually effective precisely b/c it creates a temporary recession  Recession  wages and other factor prices begin to adjust  econ starts to approach its new long-run equilibrium  wages start to increase at slower rate than before/may even fall (i.e. wage growth declines due to excess supply of labour)  pressure on prices to rise declines  inflation falls  nominal interest rates fall  In the long run, money is neutral, b/c changes in the money supply have no long-run effect on real variables (e.g. GDP, employment, and investment), but do have an effect on nominal variables (e.g. price level or rate of inflation)  A.k.a. changes in the money supply do not change the level of potential output (Y*)  In the short run, money is not neutral, b/c changes in the money supply affect real variables  A.k.a. (in the short run) monetary policy shifts the AD curve and generates short-run changes in real GDP Saving and Growth in Japan:  In the 1990s, Japan’s economy grew very little – this was largely due to “too much” saving (not enough activity to stimulate the econ)… BUT high saving was also a primary reason for Japan’s econ success (growth) over the previous 40 yrs… HOW?  In the short run, w/ factor prices and tech more or less constant, an increase in households’ desire to save implies a reduction in expenditure  reduction in output  AD curve shifts left  real GDP falls  econ slump  In the long run, after wages and prices adjust to the recessionary gap, greater saving  larger pool of financial capital  interest rate is driven down  increased investment  econ converges on a higher level of potential output in the long run  Countries w/ high long-run investment rates tend to be countries w/ high rates of long-run per capita GDP growth  Nat’l income in the short run is largely demand determined  Nat’l income in the long run is largely supply determined A Need to Think Differently:  Short-run changes in GDP must be viewed as deviations of output from potential output  Long-run changes in GDP must be viewed as changes in the level of potential output 25.2 Accounting for Changes in GDP The val of potential GDP is estimated by combining 3 pieces of info: 1. The amts of available factors of production 2. An estimate of these factors’ “normal” rates of utilization 3. An estimate of each factor’s productivity Changes in GDP:  Short-run changes in GDP primarily involve the opening and then closing of an output gap  Long-run changes in GDP involve changes in potential GDP, w/ little of no change in the output gap  Output is determined in the short run by the AD and AS curves  Output is determined in the long run only by the level of Y* GDP Accounting – The Basic Principle: We can break down GDP into its component parts  GDP = GDP  GDP = F × (GDP/F)  F is econ’s total available stock of factors  GDP = F × (FE/F) × (GDP/F )E  F Es the number of the econ’s factors that are employed **NOTE: It is not actually possible to add labour, land, and capital together to get F, b/c different factors are measured in different units… however, we do so for simplicity’s sake  F is the econ’s factor supply (total amt of factors of production that the econ currently possesses)  FE/F is the factor utilization rate (the fraction of total supply of factors that is actually used or employed at any given time)  GDP/F iE a simple measure of productivity b/c it shows the amt of output (GDP) per unit of input employed (F E  Any change in GDP can be decomposed into a change in factor supply, a change in factor utilization, and a
More Less

Related notes for ECON 209

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit