GEOG 217 Lecture Notes - Lecture 19: Sulfur Dioxide, Glocalization, Non-State Actor

46 views7 pages
Lecture 19 March 19th
Geographical Futures
Take home points from last time:
Massive changes to national economies due to globalization (in this case: services)
Changes in health, social, financial impacts for employees
o How to balance them?
Global-local identities
o Cross cultural
o Fake-real
o public-private
Impacts at the very local, of the global
How would a theorist approach this case?
Hyperglobalisers- Skeptics- Transformationalists… or more like glocalization?
o Indian state encouraged these companies- tax breaks & incentives. State has
a role
o Massive changes to large segment of population & urban scene
(consumption/infrastructure etc.)
o Workers are caught between local-global identities 2
Two common future narratives: Utopian vs. Dystopian
Happy and peaceful vs. death and destruction
Utopian visions
Technological advancement
Power of markets to allocate scarce resources
Adaptability/ingenuity of communities
o Ex. Sulphur Dioxide in the US
US Market for SO2 Allowances
Coal burning emission (sulfur dioxide) is a primary product of coal burning power
plants
So2 pollution lowers the PH scale of rainfall, leading to acid rain
o Lakes, rivers: increased acidity
o Forests: slower growth, injury or death
o Visibility: impaired, smoggy
SO2 can impair respiratory function and is linked to a variety of respiratory
ailments
The process of setting up a market for pollution emissions involved three steps:
1. est. an overall cap on pollution
o To reduce SO2 emissions by 50%, this rate considered to be safer
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 7 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
2. Allocate permits (Allowances) to polluters
3. Facilitate trading between polluters
o In the US, So2 market trading is unrestricted
o Stiff penalties to those who exceeded their allowances
Outcome: Sulphur dioxide reduced because of regulatory scheme (human ingenuity
+ technological improvements= tech solutions are possible!)
Dystopian Visions
CO2 is increasing
Large scale natural disasters are happening
Ex. oil spills, land grabs
Where are we really headed?
Have our discussions supported or challenged the optimistic or pessimistic vision?
Our aim was to challenge either of these as a complete vision of the future:
o Unevenness of development
o Localization of global phenomenon
o Political influence on the shape of institutions
Saskia Sassen: Global Cities as Today’s Frontiers
Frontiers- two people from different worlds encounter each other, no established
rules for their encounter, according to her, they are now at the heart of the system,
in global cities
Cities- spaces with some anarchy
Clean, familiar, routinized, doesn’t mean a city
Densely built up terrain, not cities
Today’s frontiers are not at the edges of the known world, but at the heart of
global cities
Frontier zones are in the middle! Not at the sides
One way to think about the future: Scenarios
Scenarios: several different versions of what the future might be
Middle ground between certainty and complexity
See graph on slides
Between prediction and speculation
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 7 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers