Class Notes (835,674)
Canada (509,327)
History (1,443)
HIST 218 (31)
Lecture

HIST 218 - Lecture: Empire and the Treaty System (Jan. 23)

6 Pages
127 Views
Unlock Document

Department
History
Course
HIST 218
Professor
Gavin Walker
Semester
Winter

Description
Jan 23 – Empire and the Treaty System Treaty system was the major driving force in relations between East Asian and Western Europe in nineteenth century. Vietnam − contemporary developments with Ming/early Qing, Tokugawa Japan, Choson Korea − relative similarity with dynamics to China, Japan, Korea at this time − relative difficulty of creating national unity out of culturally heterogenous space − involve many more diverse economic and social policies than Western historians often credit − what ties these areas together is, on one hand, the national disunity, and the other, a set of dynamics that come out of the integration of East Asia with the world economic and western markets − this phenomenon exert tremendous influence and effort on the legal and economic systems of these East Asian countries − Le Dynasty (1428 – 1788): independence from tributary rule by Ming China − at the same time, maintained very close relationship with Ming culture − continuing influence of Ming cultural and institutional norms (civil service examinations, classical Chinese learning, classical Confucian ministries of state, Confucian social hierarchy, etc.) − thus, many of the same dynamics as Choson Korea − land question: land belongs essentially to imperial household (not to state nor to individual farmers), but set by governmental ministries − Confucian orthodoxy in state planning, ministerial order − question that is salient to all East Asian societies at this time − similar to European feudalism: control of land is control of political power − yet different from Europe: not necessarily control of land is important in Vietnam (and Japan), but rather, control of taxation on land − control of rice, products grown, etc. − Le Dynasty regains control over Mac Dynasty (1527 – 1592) − 16 century dynastic struggles install complex system of co- dependence throughout Vietnam − division between North and South important − south sees influence of broader southeast Asian cultures; influence of India, of Sanskrit − north sees close relationship with Chinese culture − Le return to power via the northern Trinh lords (largely feudal domain- style alliance of small military holdings) − need to create various regional alliances between various powers − General situation of statelemate throughout Vietnam − Le imperial household in Hanoi, only functions through Trinh support, while south is held by Nguyen-aligned forces − Nguyen not just enjoying socio-economic independence from North, but also distinct cultural influences − tributary relationship to Ming (loyalists flee Qing rule to Nguyen-held areas of Vietnam) − Vietnam and Cambodia: long history of struggle − Nguyen hegemony in south forms quasi-state entity, locked in stalemate with Trinh in the north; hence Nguyen expansion towards the southwest, particularly Cambodia − 1674: entrance of Nguyen forces into Saigon (Saigon itself passes from majority Khmer to majority Vietnamese in following centuries) − separation of cultural spheres of Vietnam − south (Nguyen) = Cham culture (early premodern Champa state roughly corresponds to 1600s Nguyen sphere of influence in southern Vietnam) − Champa state cultural background also in Sanskrit language of scripture, Hinduism − North (Trinh lords, Le imperial household): Ming Chinese sphere of influence (linguistic influence, influence of Confucianism) − it is in this period that a unified space of Vietnam first emerges − again, this space has two dimensions, north-south − Tay Son uprising (1771-1820) − intense period of peasant uprisings around East Asia − factors in peasant unrest − intensification of feudal power around East Asia; social position of peasantry and taxation standards − impact of trade and increasing contact of Europe (crucial!!) − expansion of external markets − rising world prices of commodities − combination of highly despotic control of land with natural resources in larger an larger demand − rising rates of exploitation of peasantry − rising of production rates and intensity − increasing peasant unrest − Tay Son village in central south Vietnam: directed primarily against corruption of officialdom and excess taxation rates − rebellion not necessarily a grandiose endeavour, but rather one against corrupt government officials, and a sense of unfairness directed at rates of taxation − Le emperor and those in upper strata appeal to Qing to intervene to protect Le emperor and Trinh lords − Qing keen to do so, because north Vietnam is traditionally Chinese sphere of influence − geography and disunity of power throughout Vietnam prevent restoration of Le − Nguyen eventually win out through massive and widespread military assistance, including that of France − will pave way for French colonial control in Indochina − contemporary t Nguyen rule is gradual collapse of Tokugawa power, extreme stagnation of Choson dynasty, and weakening Qing state − at the same time, this is when modern imperial power (Britain and France primarily) enters East Asia power − Nguyen rule over unified Vietnam (1802-1867): need to combine cultural and institutionally the former spaces of north (Le dynasty,
More Less

Related notes for HIST 218

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit